Prospective assessment of treatment use by patients with personality disorders
- PMID: 16452705
- PMCID: PMC2705621
- DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.57.2.254
Prospective assessment of treatment use by patients with personality disorders
Abstract
Objective: This study examined the utilization of mental health treatments over a three-year period among patients with schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, or obsessive-compulsive personality disorders compared with patients with major depressive disorder and no personality disorder.
Methods: A prospective, longitudinal study design was used to measure treatment use for 633 individuals aged 18 to 45 years during a three-year period.
Results: Patients with borderline personality disorder were significantly more likely than those with major depressive disorder to use most types of treatment. Furthermore, all patients continued using high-intensity, low-duration treatments throughout the study period, whereas individual psychotherapy attendance declined significantly after one year.
Conclusions: Although our data showed that patients with borderline personality disorder used more mental health services than those with major depressive disorder, many questions remain about the adequacy of the treatment received by all patients with personality disorders.
References
-
- Bender DS, Dolan RT, Skodol AE, et al. Treatment utilization by patients with personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2001;158:295–302. - PubMed
-
- Zanarini MC, Frankenburg FR, Hennen J, et al. Mental health service utilization of borderline patients and axis II comparison subjects followed prospectively for six years. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2004;65:28–36. - PubMed
-
- Gunderson JG, Shea MT, Skodol AE, et al. The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: development, aims, design, and sample characteristics. Journal of Personality Disorders. 2000;14:300–315. - PubMed
-
- Zanarini MC, Frankenburg FR, Sickel AE, et al. Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders. McLean Hospital; Belmont, Mass: 1996.
-
- Zanarini MC, Skodol AE, Bender DS, et al. The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: reliability of axis I and II diagnoses. Journal of Personality Disorders. 2000;14:291–299. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- R10 MH050838/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- R01 MH050839/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- MH-50839/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- R10 MH050839/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- R01 MH050838/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- MH-50840/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- K23 MH073708/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- R01 MH050837/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- K23 MH069904/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- MH-50850/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- MH-50837/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- R10 MH050850/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- MH-50838/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- R10 MH050837/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- R01 MH050850/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- R10 MH050840/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- R01 MH050840/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical