High pain ratings predict treatment failure in chronic occupational musculoskeletal disorders
- PMID: 16452743
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02968
High pain ratings predict treatment failure in chronic occupational musculoskeletal disorders
Abstract
Background: Pain intensity is one of the most widely used measures in the treatment of patients with chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorders. Few studies have comprehensively investigated the relationship of pain intensity at the time of rehabilitation to objective socioeconomic outcomes at one year after treatment. This study evaluated the ability of pain intensity ratings, measured with a visual analog scale, to predict rehabilitation outcomes and to identify patients who are "at risk" for a poor outcome.
Methods: A cohort of 3106 patients with chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorders in a multidisciplinary occupational tertiary rehabilitation program was divided into four groups on the basis of the pain intensity ratings (0 to 3, 4 to 5, 6 to 7, and 8 to 10) before and after rehabilitation. A structured interview to assess the socioeconomic outcomes, including work status, health-care utilization, recurrent injury, and whether there had been resolution of Workers' Compensation or third-party financial disputes, was conducted one year after rehabilitation.
Results: High pain intensity before rehabilitation was linearly associated with declining rates of program completion and higher rates of self-reported depression and disability after rehabilitation. Although higher pain ratings both before and after rehabilitation were associated linearly with a declining quality of socioeconomic outcomes, extremely high pain ratings (8 to 10) after rehabilitation were most predictive of poor outcomes. At the post-rehabilitation evaluation, patients with extreme pain were far more likely than those with mild pain to seek surgical treatment (risk ratio = 11.2 [95% confidence interval, 4.3, 29.5]) or to persist in seeking health care from new providers (risk ratio = 3.3 [95% confidence interval, 2.4, 4.5]). They were less likely to either return to work (risk ratio = 3.9 [95% confidence interval, 2.6, 6.0]) or to retain work (risk ratio = 4.2 [95% confidence interval, 2.9, 6.0]). They were also twice as likely to claim a new injury to the same musculoskeletal site after returning to work and to fail to settle Workers' Compensation or third-party financial disputes.
Conclusions: High pain ratings before rehabilitation are associated with higher rehabilitation dropout rates. The patients with chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorders who reported extreme pain after completing a full course of extended treatment (13% of 2573) were at risk for poor outcomes in terms of lost productivity, high utilization of health care, and cost-shifting of state Workers' Compensation payments to federal resources.
Similar articles
-
Unremitting health-care-utilization outcomes of tertiary rehabilitation of patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Jan;86(1):62-9. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200401000-00011. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004. PMID: 14711947
-
Failure to complete a functional restoration program for chronic musculoskeletal disorders: a prospective 1-year outcome study.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Aug;86(8):1509-15. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.02.010. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005. PMID: 16084800
-
Effect of age on outcomes of tertiary rehabilitation for chronic disabling spinal disorders.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jun 15;26(12):1378-84. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200106150-00023. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001. PMID: 11426155
-
Reducing the costs of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: targeting strategies to chronic disability cases.J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004 Feb;14(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.09.013. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004. PMID: 14759748 Review.
-
The management of musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace.Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Jun;29(3):345-55. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Apr 19. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015. PMID: 26612234 Review.
Cited by
-
What is the best surface EMG measure of lumbar flexion-relaxation for distinguishing chronic low back pain patients from pain-free controls?Clin J Pain. 2013 Apr;29(4):334-40. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318267252d. Clin J Pain. 2013. PMID: 23328325 Free PMC article.
-
Back to work: evaluation of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program with emphasis on mental symptoms; A two-year follow up.J Multidiscip Healthc. 2012;5:145-51. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S32372. Epub 2012 Jun 25. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2012. PMID: 22807632 Free PMC article.
-
A Controlled and Retrospective Study of 144 Chronic Low Back Pain Patients to Evaluate the Effectiveness of an Intensive Functional Restoration Program in France.Healthcare (Basel). 2016 Apr 27;4(2):23. doi: 10.3390/healthcare4020023. Healthcare (Basel). 2016. PMID: 27417611 Free PMC article.
-
A Novel Quantitative Pain Assessment Instrument That Provides Means of Comparing Patient's Pain Magnitude With a Measurement of Their Pain Tolerance.J Clin Med Res. 2015 Oct;7(10):781-90. doi: 10.14740/jocmr2277e. Epub 2015 Aug 23. J Clin Med Res. 2015. PMID: 26346200 Free PMC article.
-
Higher opioid doses predict poorer functional outcome in patients with chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorders.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Apr;91(4):919-27. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00286. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009. PMID: 19339577 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical