Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review
- PMID: 16454841
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00390.x
Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review
Abstract
Background and aims: Colonoscopy is the best available method to detect and remove colonic polyps and therefore serves as the gold standard for less invasive tests such as virtual colonoscopy. Although gastroenterologists agree that colonoscopy is not infallible, there is no clarity on the numbers and rates of missed polyps. The purpose of this systematic review was to obtain summary estimates of the polyp miss rate as determined by tandem colonoscopy.
Methods: An extensive search was performed within PUBMED, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases to identify studies in which patients had undergone two same-day colonoscopies with polypectomy. Random effects models based on the binomial distribution were used to calculate pooled estimates of miss rates.
Results: Six studies with a total of 465 patients could be included. The pooled miss rate for polyps of any size was 22% (95% CI: 19-26%; 370/1,650 polyps). Adenoma miss rate by size was, respectively, 2.1% (95% CI: 0.3-7.3%; 2/96 adenomas > or =10 mm), 13% (95% CI: 8.0-18%; 16/124 adenomas 5-10 mm), and 26% (95% CI: 27-35%; 151/587 adenomas 1-5 mm). Three studies reported data on nonadenomatous polyps: zero of eight nonadenomatous polyps > or =10 mm were missed (0%; 95% CI: 0-36.9%) and 83 of 384 nonadenomatous polyps <10 mm were missed (22%; 95% CI: 18-26%).
Conclusions: Colonoscopy rarely misses polyps > or =10 mm, but the miss rate increases significantly in smaller sized polyps. The available evidence is based on a small number of studies with heterogeneous study designs and inclusion criteria.
Similar articles
-
Transabdominal ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound for diagnosis of gallbladder polyps.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 15;8(8):CD012233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012233.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30109701 Free PMC article.
-
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35593186 Free PMC article.
-
Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;(2):CD001724. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001724.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 29;5:CD001724. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001724.pub3. PMID: 16625546 Updated.
-
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29372930 Free PMC article.
-
Strategies for detecting colon cancer and/or dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;(2):CD000279. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000279.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 18;9:CD000279. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000279.pub4. PMID: 16625534 Updated.
Cited by
-
Ratio images and ultraviolet C excitation in autofluorescence imaging of neoplasms of the human colon.J Biomed Opt. 2013 Jan;18(1):16005. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.18.1.016005. J Biomed Opt. 2013. PMID: 23291657 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing the Cost-Effectiveness of Innovative Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Feb 1;113(2):154-161. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa103. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021. PMID: 32761199 Free PMC article.
-
Back-to-back comparison of auto-fluorescence imaging (AFI) versus high resolution white light colonoscopy for adenoma detection.BMC Gastroenterol. 2012 Jun 22;12:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-75. BMC Gastroenterol. 2012. PMID: 22726319 Free PMC article.
-
Choosing the optimal method in programmatic colorectal cancer screening: current evidence and controversies.Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul;8(4):221-33. doi: 10.1177/1756283X15578610. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26136839 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Can the adenoma detection rate reliably identify low-performing endoscopists? Results of a modeling study.Dig Dis Sci. 2013 Jul;58(7):1856-62. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2592-2. Epub 2013 Mar 2. Dig Dis Sci. 2013. PMID: 23456494
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical