Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Feb;10(2):240-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.07.027.

Debunking dogma: surgery for four or more colorectal liver metastases is justified

Affiliations

Debunking dogma: surgery for four or more colorectal liver metastases is justified

Timothy M Pawlik et al. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006 Feb.

Abstract

Treatment of four or more colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) is controversial and remains a relative contraindication to surgery at some institutions. We sought to assess the outcome of patients with four or more CRLMs treated with surgery. Patients (159) with four or more CRLMs were treated surgically at a single institution. The median number of treated lesions was 5 (range, 4-14). The majority of patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (89.9%). Forty-six (29.0%) patients underwent resection only, 12 (7.5%) underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) only, and 101 (63.5%) underwent resection plus RFA. The 5-year actuarial disease-free and overall survival rates were 21.5% and 50.9%, respectively. Patients who underwent RFA as part of their surgical procedure (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.81, P = 0.03) and those with a positive surgical resection margin (HR = 1.52, P = 0.01) were more likely to have a shorter time to recurrence. Patients who did not have a reduction in tumor size following neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a higher likelihood of death following surgical treatment (HR = 2.53, P = 0.01). Patients with four or more CRLMs should be considered for aggressive surgical treatment, including liver resection with or without RFA, in order to improve the chance of long-term survival. Certain clinicopathologic factors, including lack of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, were associated with a worse prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ann Surg. 2004 Dec;240(6):1052-61; discussion 1061-4 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2000 Sep;232(3):381-91 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000 Sep;7(8):593-600 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 1992 May;127(5):561-8; discussion 568-9 - PubMed
    1. Surgery. 1986 Aug;100(2):278-84 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources