The detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: 99mTc-MDP Planar bone scintigraphy, single- and multi-field-of-view SPECT, 18F-fluoride PET, and 18F-fluoride PET/CT
- PMID: 16455635
The detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: 99mTc-MDP Planar bone scintigraphy, single- and multi-field-of-view SPECT, 18F-fluoride PET, and 18F-fluoride PET/CT
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the detection of bone metastases by 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (99mTc-MDP) planar bone scintigraphy (BS), SPECT, 18F-Fluoride PET, and 18F-Fluoride PET/CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer.
Methods: In a prospective study, BS and 18F-Fluoride PET/CT were performed on the same day in 44 patients with high-risk prostate cancer. In 20 of the latter patients planar BS was followed by single field-of-view (FOV) SPECT and in 24 patients by multi-FOV SPECT of the axial skeleton. Lesions were interpreted separately on each of the 4 modalities as normal, benign, equivocal, or malignant.
Results: In patient-based analysis, 23 patients had skeletal metastatic spread (52%) and 21 did not. Categorizing equivocal and malignant interpretation as suggestive for malignancy, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of planar BS were 70%, 57%, 64%, and 55%, respectively, of multi-FOV SPECT were 92%, 82%, 86%, and 90%, of (18)F-Fluoride PET were 100%, 62%, 74%, and 100%, and of 18F-Fluoride PET/CT were 100% for all parameters. Using the McNemar test, 18F-Fluoride PET/CT was statistically more sensitive and more specific than planar or SPECT BS (P < 0.05) and more specific than 18F-Fluoride PET (P < 0.001). SPECT was statistically more sensitive and more specific than planar BS (P < 0.05) but was less sensitive than 18F-Fluoride PET (P < 0.05). In lesion-based analysis, 156 lesions with increased uptake of 18F-Fluoride were assessed. Based on the corresponding appearance on CT, lesions were categorized by PET/CT as benign (n = 99), osteoblastic metastasis (n = 46), or equivocal when CT was normal (n = 11). Of the 156 18F-Fluoride lesions, 81 lesions (52%), including 34 metastases, were overlooked with normal appearance on planar BS. SPECT identified 62% of the lesions overlooked by planar BS. 18F-Fluoride PET/CT was more sensitive and more specific than BS (P < 0.001) and more specific than PET alone (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: 18F-Fluoride PET/CT is a highly sensitive and specific modality for detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer. It is more specific than 18F-Fluoride PET alone and more sensitive and specific than planar and SPECT BS. Detection of bone metastases is improved by SPECT compared with planar BS and by 18F-Fluoride PET compared with SPECT. This added value of 18F-Fluoride PET/CT may beneficially impact the clinical management of patients with high-risk prostate cancer.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of malignant skeletal disease: initial experience with 18F-fluoride PET/CT and comparison between 18F-fluoride PET and 18F-fluoride PET/CT.J Nucl Med. 2004 Feb;45(2):272-8. J Nucl Med. 2004. PMID: 14960647 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of 18F fluoride PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scan in the detection of skeletal metastases in urinary bladder carcinoma.Clin Nucl Med. 2013 Aug;38(8):616-21. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e31828da5cc. Clin Nucl Med. 2013. PMID: 23603596
-
18F-fluoride PET/CT for bone scanning. Role of attenuation correction.Nuklearmedizin. 2012;51(3):84-7. doi: 10.3413/Nukmed-0433-11-10. Epub 2012 Feb 27. Nuklearmedizin. 2012. PMID: 22366817
-
The role of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in benign and malignant bone disease.Semin Nucl Med. 2006 Oct;36(4):286-94. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2006.05.001. Semin Nucl Med. 2006. PMID: 16950146 Review.
-
A meta-analysis of ¹⁸FDG-PET-CT, ¹⁸FDG-PET, MRI and bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with lung cancer.Eur J Radiol. 2012 May;81(5):1007-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.126. Epub 2011 Feb 26. Eur J Radiol. 2012. PMID: 21354739 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of bone-seeking novel radiotracer 68Ga-NO2AP-Bisphosphonate for the detection of skeletal metastases in carcinoma breast.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Jan;44(1):41-49. doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3469-3. Epub 2016 Jul 25. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017. PMID: 27455986
-
Update on advances in molecular PET in urological oncology.Jpn J Radiol. 2016 Jul;34(7):470-85. doi: 10.1007/s11604-016-0553-3. Epub 2016 May 24. Jpn J Radiol. 2016. PMID: 27222021 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of 18 F-NaF Imaging, 99m Tc-MDP Scintigraphy, and 18 F-FDG for Detecting Bone Metastases.World J Nucl Med. 2022 Apr 30;21(1):1-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1748154. eCollection 2022 Mar. World J Nucl Med. 2022. PMID: 35502272 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Imaging modalities for primary diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer].Urologe A. 2010 Feb;49(2):190-8. doi: 10.1007/s00120-010-2235-6. Urologe A. 2010. PMID: 20180058 Review. German.
-
Role of PET imaging for biochemical recurrence following primary treatment for prostate cancer.Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Sep;7(Suppl 4):S462-S476. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.06.09. Transl Androl Urol. 2018. PMID: 30363475 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical