Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Feb;15(1):65-70.
doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.015362.

Prediction of pressure ulcer development in hospitalized patients: a tool for risk assessment

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Prediction of pressure ulcer development in hospitalized patients: a tool for risk assessment

L Schoonhoven et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: To identify independent predictors for development of pressure ulcers in hospitalized patients and to develop a simple prediction rule for pressure ulcer development.

Design: The Prevention and Pressure Ulcer Risk Score Evaluation (prePURSE) study is a prospective cohort study in which patients are followed up once a week until pressure ulcer occurrence, discharge from hospital, or length of stay over 12 weeks. Data were collected between January 1999 and June 2000.

Setting: Two large hospitals in the Netherlands.

Participants: Adult patients admitted to the surgical, internal, neurological and geriatric wards for more than 5 days were eligible. A consecutive sample of 1536 patients was visited, 1431 (93%) of whom agreed to participate. Complete follow up data were available for 1229 (80%) patients.

Main outcome measures: Occurrence of a pressure ulcer grade 2 or worse during admission to hospital.

Results: Independent predictors of pressure ulcers were age, weight at admission, abnormal appearance of the skin, friction and shear, and planned surgery in coming week. The area under the curve of the final prediction rule was 0.70 after bootstrapping. At a cut off score of 20, 42% of the patient weeks were identified as at risk for pressure ulcer development, thus correctly identifying 70% of the patient weeks in which a pressure ulcer occurred.

Conclusion: A simple clinical prediction rule based on five patient characteristics may help to identify patients at increased risk for pressure ulcer development and in need of preventive measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: none declared.

References

    1. Health Council of the Netherlands Pressure ulcers. Publication no 1999/23. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands, 1999
    1. Cuddigan J, Ayello E A, Sussman C. eds. Pressure ulcers in America. Prevalence, incidence, and implications for the future. Reston, VA: National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), 2001 - PubMed
    1. Bours G J J W, Halfens R J G, Huijer Abu‐Saad H.et al Prevalence, prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: descriptive study in 89 institutions in the Netherlands. Res Nurs Health 20022599–110. - PubMed
    1. Schoonhoven L.Prediction of pressure ulcers: problems and prospects. PhD thesis. The Netherlands: University of Utrecht, 2003
    1. Edwards M. The rationale for the use of risk calculators in pressure sore prevention, and the evidence of the reliability and validity of published scales. J Adv Nurs 199420288–296. - PubMed

Publication types