Suspended judgment. Is the scientific paper a fraud?

Review

W A Silverman. Control Clin Trials. 1991 Apr.

. 1991 Apr;12(2):273-6.

doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(91)90024-g.

No abstract available

Similar articles

The history and practice of peer review.
Chapelle FH. Chapelle FH. Ground Water. 2014 Jan-Feb;52(1):1. doi: 10.1111/gwat.12139. Epub 2013 Nov 22. Ground Water. 2014. PMID: 24266884 No abstract available.
[Fraud and pharmacist: an old companionship from Antiquity to nowadays].
Bonnemain B. Bonnemain B. Rev Hist Pharm (Paris). 2014 Jun;62(382):175-84. Rev Hist Pharm (Paris). 2014. PMID: 25090836 French.
Publishing in biomedical journals: The system in review.
Brumback RA. Brumback RA. J Child Neurol. 1991 Jul;6(3):193-5. doi: 10.1177/088307389100600301. J Child Neurol. 1991. PMID: 1875021 No abstract available.
Enhancing reproducibility: Failures from Reproducibility Initiatives underline core challenges.
Mullane K, Williams M. Mullane K, et al. Biochem Pharmacol. 2017 Aug 15;138:7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 Apr 8. Biochem Pharmacol. 2017. PMID: 28396196 Review.
Scientific Misconduct (Fraud) in Medical Writing.
Mavrogenis AF, Panagopoulos GN, Megaloikonomos PD, Panagopoulos VN, Mauffrey C, Quaile A, Scarlat MM. Mavrogenis AF, et al. Orthopedics. 2018 Mar 1;41(2):e176-e183. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20180123-06. Epub 2018 Jan 29. Orthopedics. 2018. PMID: 29377051 Review.