Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems
- PMID: 16461488
- DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nci762
Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems
Abstract
Four digital intra-oral radiographic systems were tested and evaluated; three charge-coupled device (CCD) based systems from RVG, Visualix and Sidexis and a photostimulable phosphor (PSP) system from DenOptix. Image quality was assessed using three purpose-built phantoms to measure uniformity, low contrast detail detectability and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Limiting resolution was measured using a 20 lp mm(-1) bar pattern. Radiation output inaccuracies caused difficulties in achieving optimum doses for CCD systems. However, the accuracy was improved by using K-edge filters. SNR measurements proved to be a useful tool in assessing system performance. Each system has specific attributes: resolution was highest for the RVG system, the Visualix system measured the highest SNR and the lowest exposure settings were on the Sidexis system. Test methods and phantoms developed are suitable for acceptance testing and commissioning digital dental X-ray systems and for programming each system to produce an optimum level of image quality.
Similar articles
-
Signal-to-noise ratios of 6 intraoral digital sensors.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 May;91(5):611-5. doi: 10.1067/moe.2001.113590. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001. PMID: 11346743
-
Chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and effective dose using four digital systems.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;114(1-3):273-7. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch572. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005. PMID: 15933121
-
Physical evaluation of prototype high-performance anti-scatter grids: potential for improved digital radiographic image quality.Phys Med Biol. 2009 Jan 21;54(2):N37-42. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/2/N02. Epub 2008 Dec 19. Phys Med Biol. 2009. PMID: 19098352
-
Dental photostimulable phosphor radiography.Dent Clin North Am. 2000 Apr;44(2):273-97, vi. Dent Clin North Am. 2000. PMID: 10740769 Review.
-
Digital radiography: update for oral health care workers.SADJ. 2004 Aug;59(7):293-5. SADJ. 2004. PMID: 15537033 Review.
Cited by
-
Efficacy of lead foil for reducing doses in the head and neck: a simulation study using digital intraoral systems.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(8):20150065. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20150065. Epub 2015 Jun 18. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015. PMID: 26084474 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of the incorporation of a lead foil to intraoral digital receptors on the image quality and root fracture diagnosis.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019 Sep;48(6):20180369. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20180369. Epub 2019 May 8. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019. PMID: 30982341 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of alternative photostimulable phosphor plates erasing times on subjective digital image quality.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010 Jan;39(1):23-7. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/49065239. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010. PMID: 20089740 Free PMC article.
-
Establishment of a local diagnostic reference level for dental intraoral bitewing X-rays.Phys Eng Sci Med. 2023 Jun;46(2):747-751. doi: 10.1007/s13246-023-01247-2. Epub 2023 Apr 4. Phys Eng Sci Med. 2023. PMID: 37016185 English.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous