Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Feb;82(1):31-3.
doi: 10.1136/sti.2005.015131.

Human papillomavirus in men: comparison of different genital sites

L V Aguilar  1 , E Lazcano-Ponce, S Vaccarella, A Cruz, P Hernández, J S Smith, N Muñoz, J R Kornegay, M Hernández-Avila, S Franceschi
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Human papillomavirus in men: comparison of different genital sites

L V Aguilar et al. Sex Transm Infect. 2006 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To elucidate which anatomical sites need to be sampled to detect human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in the lower male genital tract.

Method: In an HPV survey of Mexican soldiers (median age 24 years; range 16-50 years), a cell sample from 2 cm deep into the distal urethra (group 1; n = 168 men), or 0.5 cm deep into the meatus urethralis (group 2; n = 414 men) was collected, along with a sample from the external genitalia. The different samples were tested for 27 HPV types using a polymerase chain reaction based strip assay.

Results: HPV DNA was detected more frequently in external genitalia samples (46.4%) than in the urethra (20.8%) or meatus samples (12.1%). Lack of samples from the urethra or meatus would have led to 5.1% and 1.5% false HPV negative results, respectively. The most frequently detected high risk HPV types (HPV 59, 52, 51, and 16) were similar in different sites, whereas low risk types were found rarely in urethra samples.

Conclusions: The addition of cell samples from the meatus to those from external genitalia contributed negligibly to the evaluation of the prevalence of HPV in men. HPV detection was slightly improved by the addition of urethra samples, but the gain may not justify the discomfort of the procedure in large epidemiological studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: none declared.

References

    1. Hippelainen M, Syrjanen S, Hippelainen M.et al Prevalence and risk factors of genital human papillomavirus (HPV) infections in healthy males: a study on Finnish conscripts. Sex Transm Dis 199320321–328. - PubMed
    1. Van Doornum G J, Prins M, Juffermans L H.et al Regional distribution and incidence of human papillomavirus infections among heterosexual men and women with multiple sexual partners: a prospective study. Genitourin Med 199470240–246. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lazcano‐Ponce E, Herrero R, Muñoz N.et al High prevalence of human papillomavirus infection in Mexican males: comparative study of penile‐urethral swabs and urine samples. Sex Transm Dis 200128277–280. - PubMed
    1. Weaver B A, Feng Q, Holmes K K.et al Evaluation of genital sites and sampling techniques for detection of human papillomavirus DNA in men. J Infect Dis 2004189677–685. - PubMed
    1. Svare E I, Kjaer S K, Worm A M.et al Risk factors for genital HPV DNA in men resemble those found in women: a study of male attendees at a Danish STD clinic. Sex Transm Infect 200278215–218. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types