Projected valve area at normal flow rate improves the assessment of stenosis severity in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) study
- PMID: 16461844
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.557678
Projected valve area at normal flow rate improves the assessment of stenosis severity in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) study
Abstract
Background: We sought to investigate the use of a new parameter, the projected effective orifice area (EOAproj) at normal transvalvular flow rate (250 mL/s), to better differentiate between truly severe (TS) and pseudo-severe (PS) aortic stenosis (AS) during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). Changes in various parameters of stenosis severity have been used to differentiate between TS and PS AS during DSE. However, the magnitude of these changes lacks standardization because they are dependent on the variable magnitude of the transvalvular flow change occurring during DSE.
Methods and results: The use of EOAproj to differentiate TS from PS AS was investigated in an in vitro model and in 23 patients with low-flow AS (indexed EOA <0.6 cm2/m2, left ventricular ejection fraction < or =40%) undergoing DSE and subsequent aortic valve replacement. For an individual valve, EOA was plotted against transvalvular flow (Q) at each dobutamine stage, and valve compliance (VC) was derived as the slope of the regression line fitted to the EOA versus Q plot; EOAproj was calculated as EOAproj=EOArest+VCx(250-Q(rest)), where EOArest and Q(rest) are the EOA and Q at rest. Classification between TS and PS was based on either response to flow increase (in vitro) or visual inspection at surgery (in vivo). EOAproj was the most accurate parameter in differentiating between TS and PS both in vitro and in vivo. In vivo, 15 of 23 patients (65%) had TS and 8 of 23 (35%) had PS. The percentage of correct classification was 83% for EOAproj and 91% for indexed EOAproj compared with percentages of 61% to 74% for the other echocardiographic parameters usually used for this purpose.
Conclusions: EOAproj provides a standardized evaluation of AS severity with DSE and improves the diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing TS and PS AS in patients with low-flow, low-gradient AS.
Comment in
-
Assessment of low-gradient aortic stenosis with dobutamine.Circulation. 2006 Feb 7;113(5):604-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.600684. Circulation. 2006. PMID: 16461831 Review. No abstract available.
-
Letter by Schinkel et al regarding article, "Projected valve area at normal flow rate improves the assessment of stenosis severity in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) study".Circulation. 2006 Oct 3;114(14):e526; author reply e527. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.635060. Circulation. 2006. PMID: 17015800 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Validation of conventional and simplified methods to calculate projected valve area at normal flow rate in patients with low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (True or Pseudo Severe Aortic Stenosis) study.J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Apr;23(4):380-6. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.02.002. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010. PMID: 20362927
-
Predictors of outcomes in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: results of the multicenter TOPAS Study.Circulation. 2008 Sep 30;118(14 Suppl):S234-42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.757427. Circulation. 2008. PMID: 18824760
-
Value of low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography on defining true severe low gradient aortic stenosis in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Dec;34(12):1877-1887. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1416-z. Epub 2018 Jul 23. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018. PMID: 30039338 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of aortic stenosis: an update--including low-flow States, myocardial mechanics, and stress testing.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015 Jun;17(6):42. doi: 10.1007/s11886-015-0601-0. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015. PMID: 25902905 Review.
-
Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: from evaluation to treatment.Curr Opin Cardiol. 2007 Mar;22(2):84-91. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32801466f5. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17284985 Review.
Cited by
-
Risk stratification and management of aortic stenosis with concomitant left ventricular dysfunction.Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2007 Dec;9(6):490-500. doi: 10.1007/s11936-007-0044-z. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2007. PMID: 18221601
-
Age related structural and functional changes in left ventricular performance in healthy subjects: a 2D echocardiographic study.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Nov;35(11):2037-2047. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01665-y. Epub 2019 Jul 11. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019. PMID: 31297672
-
The utility of computed tomography in the context of aortic valve disease.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Aug;25(6):611-4. doi: 10.1007/s10554-009-9472-z. Epub 2009 May 26. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009. PMID: 19468861 No abstract available.
-
Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Valve Stenosis: The Role of Non-Invasive Imaging.J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 23;10(16):3745. doi: 10.3390/jcm10163745. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34442039 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Multimodality Imaging to Explore Sex Differences in Aortic Stenosis.Eur Cardiol. 2022 Dec 19;17:e26. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2022.26. eCollection 2022 Feb. Eur Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 36845220 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials