Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Sep;16(3):266-71.

Analysis of one-step and two-step real-time RT-PCR using SuperScript III

Affiliations

Analysis of one-step and two-step real-time RT-PCR using SuperScript III

Michael J Wacker et al. J Biomol Tech. 2005 Sep.

Abstract

Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is a commonly used technique to analyze gene expression. There has been little research conducted to test if SuperScript III quantitative one-step (reverse transcription carried out in the same tube as PCR) and two-step (reverse transcription carried out in a separate reaction) RT-PCR systems provide similar real-time results. In this study, real-time reactions were set up using the housekeeping genes glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), beta2-microglobulin (B2M), and RNA polymerase 2 subunit A (PolR2A). Reaction efficiencies were determined by generating standard curves using total RNA isolated from human skeletal muscle and brain. Reaction efficiencies ranged from 97.7+/-0.9% to 99.4+/-1.8% for one-step and 98.0+/-0.2% to 102.6+/-1.3% for two-step RT-PCR (R2 values for all reactions>or=0.995). The sensitivities of one-step and two-step methods, as measured by cycle threshold values, were similar for GAPDH and B2M. However, for the lesser expressed PolR2A mRNA there was a 5 cycle lower threshold for one-step. In summary, both SuperScript III one-step and two-step methods yield reaction efficiencies close to 100% and produce similar, accurate, linear standard curves. However, using the one-step method with gene-specific priming may be more sensitive for quantification of certain genes such as PolR2A.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Real-time reaction run with β2-microglobulin primer/probe and the SSIII one-step quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction kit. A: Real-time fluorescence using 1:10-fold dilutions of total RNA from skeletal muscle run in triplicate. B: The standard curve generated from the cycle thresholds of each of the dilutions and the equation of the line of best fit.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bustin SA, Nolan T. Pitfalls of quantitative real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. J Biomol Tech 2004;15:155–166. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walker NJ. A technique whose time has come. Science 2002;296:557–559. - PubMed
    1. Wilhelm J, Pingoud A. Real-time polymerase chain reaction. Chembiochem 2003;4:1120–1128. - PubMed
    1. Lekanne Deprez RH, Fijnvandraat AC, Ruijter JM, Moorman AF. Sensitivity and accuracy of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction using SYBR green I depends on cDNA synthesis conditions. Anal Biochem 2002;307:63–69. - PubMed
    1. Stahlberg A, Hakansson J, Xian X, Semb H, Kubista M. Properties of the reverse transcription reaction in mRNA quantification. Clin Chem 2004;50:509–515. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources