Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2006;13(1):33-41.
doi: 10.1007/s00534-005-1049-1.

JPN Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: severity assessment of acute pancreatitis

Affiliations
Practice Guideline

JPN Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: severity assessment of acute pancreatitis

Masahiko Hirota et al. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006.

Abstract

This article addresses the criteria for severity assessment and the severity scoring system of the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan; now the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare (the JPN score). It also presents data comparing the JPN score with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and the Ranson score, which are the major measuring scales used in the United States and Europe. The goal of investigating these scoring systems is the achievement of earlier diagnosis and more appropriate and successful treatment of severe or moderate acute pancreatitis, which has a high mortality rate. This article makes the following recommendations in terms of assessing the severity of acute pancreatitis: (1) Severity assessment is indispensable to the selection of proper initial treatment in the management of acute pancreatitis (Recommendation A). (2) Assessment by a severity scoring system (JPN score, APACHE II score) is important for determining treatment policy and identifying the need for transfer to a specialist unit (Recommendation A). (3) C-reactive protein (CRP) is a useful indicator for assessing severity (Recommendation A). (4) Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scanning and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) play an important role in severity assessment (Recommendation A). (5) A JPN score of 2 or more (severe acute pancreatitis) has been established as the criterion for hospital transfer (Recommendation A). (6) It is preferable to transfer patients with severe acute pancreatitis to a specialist medical institution where they can receive continuous monitoring and systemic management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mayumi T, Ura H, Arata S, et al. Evidence-baced clinical practice guidelines for acute pancreatitis: proposals. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2002;9:413–22. doi: 10.1007/s005340200051. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kish MA. Guide to development of practice guidelines. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:851–4. doi: 10.1086/319366. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ranson JH, Rifkind KM, Roses DF, et al. Prognostic signs and the role of operative management in acute pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1974;139:69–81. - PubMed
    1. Ranson JH. Etiological and prognostic factors in human acute pancreatitis: a review. Am J Gastroenterol. 1982;77:633–8. - PubMed
    1. Imrie CW, Benjamin IS, Ferguson JC, et al. A single-centre double-blind trial of Trasylol therapy in primary acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 1978;65:337–41. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800650514. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types