Acoustic noise characteristics of a 4 Telsa MRI scanner
- PMID: 16463341
- DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20526
Acoustic noise characteristics of a 4 Telsa MRI scanner
Abstract
Purpose: To quantify the acoustic noise characteristics of a 4 Tesla MRI scanner, and determine the effects of structural acoustics and gradient pulse excitations on the sound field so that feasible noise control measures can be developed.
Materials and methods: Acoustic noise emissions were measured in the ear and mouth locations of a typical adult. The sound pressure measurements were acquired simultaneously with the electrical current signals of the gradient pulses. Two forms of gradient waveforms (impulsive and operating pulses) were studied.
Results: The sound pressure levels (SPLs) emitted by the MRI scanner operating in echo-planar imaging (EPI) mode were in the range of 120-130 decibels. Three types of sound pressure responses were observed in the EPI sequences: 1) harmonic, 2) nonharmonic, and 3) broadband. The frequency-encoding gradient pulses were the most dominant and produced generally odd-number harmonics and nonharmonics. The phase-encoding gradient pulses generated mostly even-number harmonics, and the slice-selection gradient pulses produced primarily a broadband spectrum.
Conclusion: The operating condition acoustic spectrum can be predicted from the magnet-structural acoustic transfer functions, which are independent of imaging sequences. This finding is encouraging because it shows that it is possible to treat such noises with an active noise control application.
(c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Echo planar imaging at 4 Tesla with minimum acoustic noise.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Jul;18(1):128-30. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10326. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003. PMID: 12815648
-
Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging acoustic noise reduction technology by magnetic gradient waveform control.Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Nov;63:170-177. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.08.015. Epub 2019 Aug 16. Magn Reson Imaging. 2019. PMID: 31425801
-
Analysis of magnetic resonance imaging acoustic noise generated by a 4.7 T experimental system.Acta Otolaryngol. 2000 Sep;120(6):739-43. doi: 10.1080/000164800750000270. Acta Otolaryngol. 2000. PMID: 11099151
-
Spatial analysis of acoustic noise transfer function with a human-body phantom in a clinical MRI scanner.Acta Radiol. 2023 Mar;64(3):1212-1221. doi: 10.1177/02841851221100079. Epub 2022 May 11. Acta Radiol. 2023. PMID: 35538857
-
Acoustic noise in a small-format 3.0-T neonatal MRI system.Pediatr Radiol. 2024 Nov;54(12):2068-2076. doi: 10.1007/s00247-024-06070-9. Epub 2024 Oct 15. Pediatr Radiol. 2024. PMID: 39404888
Cited by
-
Adaptive speech enhancement using directional microphone in a 4-T MRI scanner.MAGMA. 2015 Oct;28(5):473-84. doi: 10.1007/s10334-015-0485-4. Epub 2015 Apr 18. MAGMA. 2015. PMID: 25894814
-
Functional neuroimaging: a brief overview and feasibility for use in chiropractic research.J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2009 Mar;53(1):59-72. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2009. PMID: 19421353 Free PMC article.
-
High resolution single-shot EPI at 7T.MAGMA. 2008 Mar;21(1-2):73-86. doi: 10.1007/s10334-007-0087-x. Epub 2007 Nov 1. MAGMA. 2008. PMID: 17973132
-
Temporal pattern of acoustic imaging noise asymmetrically modulates activation in the auditory cortex.Hear Res. 2016 Jan;331:57-68. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.09.017. Epub 2015 Oct 28. Hear Res. 2016. PMID: 26519093 Free PMC article.
-
A Miniature, Fiber-Optic Vibrometer for Measuring Unintended Acoustic Output of Active Hearing Implants during Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Sensors (Basel). 2021 Oct 2;21(19):6589. doi: 10.3390/s21196589. Sensors (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34640909 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical