Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2005 Winter;38(4):543-7.
doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.161-04.

Assessing object-to-picture and picture-to-object matching as prerequisite skills for pictorial preference assessments

Affiliations
Case Reports

Assessing object-to-picture and picture-to-object matching as prerequisite skills for pictorial preference assessments

Theresa M Clevenger et al. J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Winter.

Abstract

Tangible and pictorial paired-stimulus (PPS) preference assessments were compared for 6 individuals with developmental disabilities. During tangible and PPS assessments, two edible items or photographs were presented on each trial, respectively, and approach responses were recorded. Both assessments yielded similar preference hierarchies for 3 participants who could match pictures and objects but different hierarchies for 3 participants who could not. Reinforcer assessments verified that items identified as high preference on PPS assessments functioned as reinforcers only for participants with matching skills.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Stimulus-preference hierarchies for both tangible and pictorial preference assessments for participants with object-picture and picture-object matching skills (Tommy, Matt, and Jeffrey, left panels) and without object-picture and picture-object matching skills (Sam, Katie, and, Mark, right panels).
Solid bars depict the results of the tangible assessment; striped bars depict the results of the pictorial assessment. Spearman rank order correlation coefficients are noted. Stimuli denoted with an asterisk were used in reinforcer assessments.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Response rates across sessions for participants without object-picture and picture-object matching skills (Sam, Katie, and Mark).

References

    1. Conyers C, Doole A, Vause T, Harapiak S, Yu D.C.T, Martin G.L. Predicting the relative efficacy of three presentation methods for assessing preferences of persons with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 2002;35:49–58. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fisher W, Piazza C.C, Bowman L.G, Hagopian L.P, Owens J.C, Slevin I. A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1992;25:491–498. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Graff R.B, Gibson L. Using pictures to assess reinforcers in individuals with developmental disabilities. Behavior Modification. 2003;27:470–483. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources