Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Mar;60(3):208-12.
doi: 10.1136/jech.200X.038398.

Socioeconomic deprivation, travel distance, location of service, and uptake of breast cancer screening in North Derbyshire, UK

Affiliations

Socioeconomic deprivation, travel distance, location of service, and uptake of breast cancer screening in North Derbyshire, UK

Ravi Maheswaran et al. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Mar.

Abstract

Background and aim: This study examined the association between socioeconomic deprivation, travel distance, urban-rural status, location and type of screening unit, and breast screening uptake. Screening was provided at 13 locations--1 fixed and 12 mobile (3 at non-health locations).

Methods: The study examined data from 1998 to 2001 for 34 868 women aged 50-64 years, calculated road travel distance, used 1991 enumeration district level Townsend socioeconomic deprivation scores, and a ward level urban-rural classification.

Results: Odds of attendance for screening decreased with increasing socioeconomic deprivation, with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.64 (95%CI 0.59 to 0.70) in the most deprived relative to the least deprived category. 87% of women lived within 8 km of their screening location. The odds ratio for a 10 km increase in distance was 0.87 (95%CI 0.79 to 0.95). The odds ratios were 1.18 (95%CI 1.08 to 1.28) for screening at a non-health relative to a health location, 1.00 (95%CI 0.94 to 1.07) for the fixed site relative to the mobile unit and 1.00 (95%CI 0.91 to 1.09) for mainly rural relative to mainly urban areas.

Conclusions: Socioeconomic inequality in breast screening uptake seems to persist in an established service. There was a small decrease with increasing distance, no difference between fixed and mobile units, and no difference between urban and rural areas but uptake seemed to be higher at non-health sites. Further work is needed to identify effective methods of decreasing socioeconomic inequalities in uptake and to confirm if non-health locations are associated with higher screening uptake.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: none.

References

    1. NHS Breast Screening Programme http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/breastscreen (accessed 10 Oct 2005)
    1. Forrest A P M.Breast cancer screening: report to the health ministers for England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. London: HMSO, 1986
    1. Department of Health The NHS cancer plan. London: Department of Health, 2000
    1. Haiart D, McKenzie L, Henderson J.et al Mobile breast screening: factors affecting uptake, efforts to increase response and acceptability. Public Health 1990104239–247. - PubMed
    1. Gatrell A, Garnett S, Rigby J.et al Uptake of screening for breast cancer in south Lancashire. Public Health 1998112297–301. - PubMed

Publication types