Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2006 Feb 14;174(4):481-2.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060014.

Sources of bias in diagnostic accuracy studies and the diagnostic process

Affiliations
Comment

Sources of bias in diagnostic accuracy studies and the diagnostic process

Toshi A Furukawa et al. CMAJ. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

References

    1. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Dinnes J, et al. A systematic review finds that diagnostic reviews fail to incorporate quality despite available tools. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:1-12. - PubMed
    1. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem 2003;49:7-18. - PubMed
    1. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, et al. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB, Di Nisio M, et al. Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies. CMAJ 2006;174(4):469-76. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999;282:1061-6. - PubMed

MeSH terms