Similar articles

• [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative].

  Werkö L. Werkö L. Lakartidningen. 2006 Oct 25-31;103(43):3288-91. Lakartidningen. 2006. PMID: 17117661 Swedish. No abstract available.
• The manuscript review process.

  Triadafilopoulos G. Triadafilopoulos G. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Dec;64(6 Suppl):S23-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.10.044. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006. PMID: 17113850 No abstract available.
• Promoting ethical conduct in the publication of research.

  Freedman JE. Freedman JE. Cardiovasc Ther. 2008 Summer;26(2):89-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-3466.2008.00045.x. Cardiovasc Ther. 2008. PMID: 18485131 No abstract available.
• Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud?

  Claxton LD. Claxton LD. Mutat Res. 2005 Jan;589(1):17-30. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.07.003. Mutat Res. 2005. PMID: 15652224 Review.
• Scientific authorship. Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines.

  Claxton LD. Claxton LD. Mutat Res. 2005 Jan;589(1):31-45. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.07.002. Mutat Res. 2005. PMID: 15652225 Review.