The safety and efficacy of angioseal in therapeutic endovascular interventions
- PMID: 16478672
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.12.014
The safety and efficacy of angioseal in therapeutic endovascular interventions
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the closure device Angioseal.
Material and methods: All consecutive patients, who underwent a therapeutic radiological intervention using the femoral artery approach from January 2001 to January 2005 in the Service of Vascular Surgery, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, France, were prospectively included in the study. The efficacy of Angioseal was defined by the ability of the device to cover the puncture site and stop bleeding. The safety was defined by the rate of complications.
Results: A total of 79 Angioseal devices were employed on 77 patients. There were 62 (78.5%) males and 17 (21.5%) females. The mean age of the patients was 65.2+/-11.6 years (mean+/-SD). All Angioseal devices were deployed successfully. There were 62 (78.4%) 6F and 17 (21.6%) 8F sheaths employed during the procedures. There were two minor (2.5%) hematomas, one (1.2%) major hematoma and one (1.2%) pseudoaneurysm after the procedure. The mean time of discharge from the hospital was 2.1+/-1.8 (mean+/-SD) days. The patients were followed up for a mean of 9.0+/-9.3 (1-60 months) months.
Conclusions: Angioseal provides a safe and effective way of closing the femoral artery puncture site with acceptable morbidity rates.
Similar articles
-
The use of the Angioseal device for femoral artery closure.J Vasc Surg. 2004 Aug;40(2):287-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.05.007. J Vasc Surg. 2004. PMID: 15297822
-
FemoSeal® Device Use for Femoral Artery Closure by Different Techniques.Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Aug;51:18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Apr 18. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 29678650
-
Safety and effectiveness of repeat arterial closure using the AngioSeal device in patients with hepatic malignancy.J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008 Dec;19(12):1704-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.09.003. Epub 2008 Oct 31. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18951046
-
Angioseal VIP® vs. StarClose SE® closure devices: a comparative analysis in non-cardiological procedures.J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017 Feb;58(1):80-86. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.16.07654-0. Epub 2013 Dec 5. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017. PMID: 24309473
-
Efficacy and safety of the angioseal vascular closure device post antegrade puncture.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008 May-Jun;31(3):558-62. doi: 10.1007/s00270-007-9281-5. Epub 2008 Feb 6. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18253787
Cited by
-
Chitosan hemostatic dressing for control of hemorrhage from femoral arterial puncture site in dogs.J Vet Sci. 2015;16(4):517-23. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2015.16.4.517. J Vet Sci. 2015. PMID: 26119165 Free PMC article.
-
Transhepatic endovascular repair for portal vein haemorrhage.CVIR Endovasc. 2020 Oct 8;3(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s42155-020-00149-8. CVIR Endovasc. 2020. PMID: 33030649 Free PMC article.
-
Use of ultrasound in the insertion of a vascular closure device: a comparative retrospective study with the standard blind technique.Radiol Med. 2015 Mar;120(3):283-8. doi: 10.1007/s11547-014-0439-3. Epub 2014 Aug 15. Radiol Med. 2015. PMID: 25120078
-
Access site complications following transfemoral coronary procedures: comparison between traditional compression and angioseal vascular closure devices for haemostasis.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015 May 9;15:34. doi: 10.1186/s12872-015-0022-4. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015. PMID: 25956814 Free PMC article.
-
Fluoroscopic guided fogarty embolectomy for an angio-seal embolism in the popliteal artery.Korean J Radiol. 2013 Jul-Aug;14(4):636-9. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2013.14.4.636. Epub 2013 Jul 17. Korean J Radiol. 2013. PMID: 23901321 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources