Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Feb;21(1):11-4.
doi: 10.3346/jkms.2006.21.1.11.

Threshold of nuchal translucency for the detection of chromosomal aberration: comparison of different cut-offs

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Threshold of nuchal translucency for the detection of chromosomal aberration: comparison of different cut-offs

Min-Hyoung Kim et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2006 Feb.

Abstract

This study evaluated the sensitivities and false positive rates of the screening test using ultrasonographic measurement of thickness of nuchal translucency (NT) with different cut-offs for chromosomal aberration in a Korean population. We included 2,570 singleton pregnancies undergoing ultrasound between 11 weeks and 14 weeks of gestation in this study. We analyzed the sensitivities of NT alone for screening chromosomal aberration using three cut-offs -2.5 mm, 3.0 mm, and 95th percentile for each crown rump length (CRL). There were 31 chromosomal aberrations (1.2%) including 12 cases of trisomy 21. The numbers of chromosomal aberrations that were detected by NT with different cut-offs of 2.5 mm, 3.0 mm and the 95th percentile CRL were 22, 18 and 23, respectively. At a threshold of 2.5 mm, the sensitivity and the false positive rate for total chromosomal aberrations were 67.7% and 6.3%, respectively. At 3.0 mm, those were 54.8% and 3.5%, respectively. At the 95th percentile CRL, those were 70.9% and 5.8%, respectively. The use of CRL-dependent cut-offs for nuchal translucency improves the detection of chromosomal aberrations when compared to fixed cut-offs in a Korean population.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Benacerraf BR, Neuberg D, Bromley B, Frigoletto FD., Jr Sonographic scoring index for prenatal detection of chromosomal abnormalities. J Ultrasound Med. 1992;11:449–458. - PubMed
    1. Benacerraf BR, Nadel A, Bromley B. Identification of second trimester fetuses with autosomal trisomy by use of a sonographic scoring index. Radiology. 1994;193:135–140. - PubMed
    1. Nicolaides KH, Azar G, Byrne D, Mansur C, Marks K. Fetal nuchal translucency: Ultrasound screening for chromosomal defects in first trimester of pregnancy. BMJ. 1992;304:867–869. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pandya PP, Snijders RJ, Johnson SP, De Lourdes Brizot M, Nicolaides KH. Screening for fetal trisomies by maternal age and fetal nuchal translucency thickness at 10 to 14 weeks of gestation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;102:957–962. - PubMed
    1. Lee JY, Choi KH, Park CW, Yun TS, Park CJ, Jang PR, Park YS. Fetal nuchal translucency measurement for detection of chromosomal abnormalities in the first trimester of high risk pregnancy. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;41:2739–2742.

Publication types