Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Apr;38(4):317-23.
doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2005.11.010.

Multiplex bead array assays: performance evaluation and comparison of sensitivity to ELISA

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Multiplex bead array assays: performance evaluation and comparison of sensitivity to ELISA

Mohamed F Elshal et al. Methods. 2006 Apr.

Abstract

The measurement of soluble cytokines and other analytes in serum and plasma is becoming increasingly important in the study and management of many diseases. As a result, there is a growing demand for rapid, precise, and cost-effective measurement of such analytes in both clinical and research laboratories. Multiplex bead array assays provide quantitative measurement of large numbers of analytes using an automated 96-well plate format. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISAs) have long been the standard for quantitative analysis of cytokines and other biomarkers, but are not well suited for high throughput multiplex analyses. However, prior to replacement of ELISA assays with multiplex bead array assays, there is a need to know how comparable these two methods are for quantitative analyses. A number of published studies have compared these two methods and it is apparent that certain elements of these assays, such as the clones of monoclonal antibodies used for detection and reporting, are pivotal in obtaining similar results from both assays. By careful consideration of these variables, it should be possible to utilize multiplex bead array assays in lieu of ELISAs for studies requiring high throughput analysis of numerous analytes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Horan PK, Wheeless LL. Quantitative Single Cell Analysis and Sorting. Science. 1977;198:149–157. - PubMed
    1. Copeland S, Siddiqui J, Remick D. Direct Comparison of Traditional ELISAs and Membrane Protein Arrays for Dtection and Quantification of Human Cytokines. J Immunol Meth. 2004;284:99–106. - PubMed
    1. Kellar KL, Douglass JP. Multiplexed Microsphere-based Flow Cytometric Immunoassays for Human Cytokines. J Immunol Meth. 2003;279:277–285. - PubMed
    1. Earley MC, Vogt RF, Shapiro HM, Mandy FF, Kellar KL, Bellisario R, Pass KA, Marti GE, Stewart CC, Hannon WH. Report from a Workshop on Multianalyte Microsphere Arrays. Cytometry. 2002;50:239–242. - PubMed
    1. Pang S, Smith J, Onley D, Reeve J, Walker M, Foy C. A Comparability Study of the Emerging Protein Array Platforms with Established ELISA Procedures. J Immunol Methods. 2005;302:1–12. - PubMed

Publication types