The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs)
- PMID: 16484114
- DOI: 10.1080/09658210500216844
The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs)
Abstract
On-line monitoring during study can be influenced by the relatedness shared between the cue and target of a paired associate. We examined the effects on people's judgements of learning (JOLs) of a different kind of relatedness, which occurs in a list organised into sets of categorically related words and unrelated words. In two experiments, participants studied a list of words organised into a series of sets of four categorically related words or four unrelated words. In Experiment 1, JOLs were made immediately after each word had been studied, and JOL magnitude was greater for related than unrelated words. In Experiment 2, JOLs were delayed after study and, as expected, they were substantially greater for related sets of words. Serial position effects (an increase in JOL magnitude across the words of a related set) were evident with immediate JOLs but not with delayed JOLs. The relatedness effect was not present early in the list for immediate JOLs but was present throughout the list for delayed JOLs. We conclude by discussing some preliminary explanations for these new phenomena.
Similar articles
-
Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Nov;29(6):1058-65. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1058. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003. PMID: 14622046
-
The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: evidence for agenda-based monitoring.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Sep;37(5):1236-42. doi: 10.1037/a0023548. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011. PMID: 21574750 Clinical Trial.
-
Empirical analysis of the intrinsic-extrinsic distinction of judgments of learning (JOLs): effects of relatedness and serial position on JOLs.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Sep;27(5):1180-91. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.27.5.1180. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001. PMID: 11550746
-
Does word frequency influence judgments of learning (JOLs)? A meta-analytic review.Can J Exp Psychol. 2020 Dec;74(4):346-353. doi: 10.1037/cep0000206. Epub 2020 Mar 19. Can J Exp Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32191049 Review.
-
A meta-analysis and systematic review of reactivity to judgements of learning.Memory. 2018 Jul;26(6):741-750. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1404111. Epub 2017 Nov 21. Memory. 2018. PMID: 29161973
Cited by
-
Judgments of learning and improvement.Mem Cognit. 2011 Feb;39(2):204-16. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0019-2. Mem Cognit. 2011. PMID: 21264622 Free PMC article.
-
Risk-based learning games improve long-term retention of information among school pupils.PLoS One. 2014 Jul 29;9(7):e103640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103640. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25072799 Free PMC article.
-
Metacognitive monitoring and dementia: how intrinsic and extrinsic cues influence judgments of learning in people with early-stage Alzheimer's disease.Neuropsychology. 2013 Jul;27(4):452-63. doi: 10.1037/a0033050. Neuropsychology. 2013. PMID: 23876118 Free PMC article.
-
I remember it now, so I'll remember it later: Working memory strength guides predictions for long-term memory performance.Mem Cognit. 2024 Nov;52(8):1775-1797. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01514-3. Epub 2024 Mar 25. Mem Cognit. 2024. PMID: 38528299 Free PMC article.
-
Metamemory for pictures of naturalistic scenes: Assessment of accuracy and cue utilization.Mem Cognit. 2021 Oct;49(7):1405-1422. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01170-5. Epub 2021 Apr 2. Mem Cognit. 2021. PMID: 33811297 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources