Implementation of an evidence-based "standard operating procedure" and outcome in septic shock
- PMID: 16484902
- DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000206112.32673.D4
Implementation of an evidence-based "standard operating procedure" and outcome in septic shock
Abstract
Objective: To assess the impact of an algorithm defining resuscitation according to early goal-directed therapy, glycemic control, administration of stress doses of hydrocortisone, and use of recombinant human activated protein C (rhAPC) on measures of organ dysfunction and outcome in septic shock.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Multidisciplinary ten-bed intensive care unit of a university hospital.
Patients: Sixty patients were analyzed: 30 consecutive patients fulfilling criteria for diagnosis of septic shock, treated from September 2002 until December 2003 after implementation of a standard operating procedure (SOP) for severe sepsis and septic shock; and 30 patients with septic shock treated from January until August 2002 in the same unit, who served as controls.
Measurements and results: Data for blood gas analysis, lactate, glucose, serum creatinine, bilirubin, white blood cells, platelets, and C-reactive protein were obtained from patient files on admission or at time of diagnosis of septic shock and at 7:00 a.m. on days 2 and 4; Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores were calculated and 28-day survival was assessed. With implementation of the SOP, use of dobutamine (12/30 vs. 2/30), insulin (blood glucose <150 mg/dL, day 4: 26/28 vs. 13/25), hydrocortisone (30/30 vs. 13/30), and rhAPC (7/30 vs. 0/30) significantly increased, whereas volume for resuscitation and use of packed red blood cells were unaffected. Mortality was 53% in the historical control group and 27% after implementation of the SOP (p < .05).
Conclusion: The combined approach of early goal-directed therapy, intensive insulin therapy, hydrocortisone administration, and additional application of rhAPC in selected cases seems to favorably influence outcome. The implementation of a "sepsis bundle" can be facilitated by a standardized protocol while significantly reducing the time until the defined therapeutic measures are realized in daily practice.
Comment in
-
Patients are not airplanes and doctors are not pilots.Crit Care Med. 2006 Nov;34(11):2869; author reply 2869-70. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000243782.04132.0F. Crit Care Med. 2006. PMID: 17053587 No abstract available.
-
Septic shock therapy: the recipe or the cook?Crit Care Med. 2006 Nov;34(11):2870; author reply 2870-1. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000244279.40022.D7. Crit Care Med. 2006. PMID: 17053589 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Implementation of an evidence-based "standard operating procedure" and outcome in septic shock: what a sepsis pilot must consider before taking flight with your next patient.Crit Care Med. 2006 Apr;34(4):1247. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000208324.00379.AD. Crit Care Med. 2006. PMID: 16550074 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Implementation and outcomes of the Multiple Urgent Sepsis Therapies (MUST) protocol.Crit Care Med. 2006 Apr;34(4):1025-32. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000206104.18647.A8. Crit Care Med. 2006. PMID: 16484890
-
Early goal-directed therapy, corticosteroid, and recombinant human activated protein C for the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department.Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;13(1):109-13. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.08.005. Epub 2005 Dec 19. Acad Emerg Med. 2006. PMID: 16365336
-
Time- and fluid-sensitive resuscitation for hemodynamic support of children in septic shock: barriers to the implementation of the American College of Critical Care Medicine/Pediatric Advanced Life Support Guidelines in a pediatric intensive care unit in a developing world.Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Dec;24(12):810-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31818e9f3a. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008. PMID: 19050666
-
The current management of septic shock.Minerva Med. 2008 Oct;99(5):431-58. Minerva Med. 2008. PMID: 18971911 Review.
-
Is steroid therapy ever of benefit to patients in the intensive care unit going into septic shock.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008 Oct;7(5):898-905. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2008.185504. Epub 2008 Jul 21. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008. PMID: 18644822 Review.
Cited by
-
Web-Based Dashboard for the Interactive Visualization and Analysis of National Risk-Standardized Mortality Rates of Sepsis in the US.J Med Syst. 2020 Jan 11;44(2):54. doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1509-9. J Med Syst. 2020. PMID: 31927706
-
Segmented regression analysis of emergency departments patient visits from Septicemia in Taiwan.Health Policy Technol. 2018 Jun;7(2):149-155. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Jan 31. Health Policy Technol. 2018. PMID: 32289003 Free PMC article.
-
Early goal-directed resuscitation of patients with septic shock: current evidence and future directions.Crit Care. 2015 Aug 28;19(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1011-9. Crit Care. 2015. PMID: 26316210 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nurse-led implementation of an insulin-infusion protocol in a general intensive care unit: improved glycaemic control with increased costs and risk of hypoglycaemia signals need for algorithm revision.BMC Nurs. 2008 Jan 18;7:1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-7-1. BMC Nurs. 2008. PMID: 18205930 Free PMC article.
-
The incidence of low venous oxygen saturation on admission to the intensive care unit: a multi-center observational study in The Netherlands.Crit Care. 2008;12(2):R33. doi: 10.1186/cc6811. Epub 2008 Mar 4. Crit Care. 2008. PMID: 18318895 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials