Bayesian clinical trials
- PMID: 16485344
- DOI: 10.1038/nrd1927
Bayesian clinical trials
Abstract
Bayesian statistical methods are being used increasingly in clinical research because the Bayesian approach is ideally suited to adapting to information that accrues during a trial, potentially allowing for smaller more informative trials and for patients to receive better treatment. Accumulating results can be assessed at any time, including continually, with the possibility of modifying the design of the trial, for example, by slowing (or stopping) or expanding accrual, imbalancing randomization to favour better-performing therapies, dropping or adding treatment arms, and changing the trial population to focus on patient subsets that are responding better to the experimental therapies. Bayesian analyses use available patient-outcome information, including biomarkers that accumulating data indicate might be related to clinical outcome. They also allow for the use of historical information and for synthesizing results of relevant trials. Here, I explain the rationale underlying Bayesian clinical trials, and discuss the potential of such trials to improve the effectiveness of drug development.
Similar articles
-
Bayesian design and conduct of phase II single-arm clinical trials with binary outcomes: a tutorial.Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 Jul;29(4):608-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2007.11.005. Epub 2007 Dec 4. Contemp Clin Trials. 2008. PMID: 18201945
-
Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.Clin Trials. 2007;4(1):5-14. doi: 10.1177/1740774506075764. Clin Trials. 2007. PMID: 17327241
-
Practical Bayesian design and analysis for drug and device clinical trials.J Biopharm Stat. 2008;18(1):54-80. doi: 10.1080/10543400701668266. J Biopharm Stat. 2008. PMID: 18161542
-
Bayesian statistics in oncology: a guide for the clinical investigator.Cancer. 2009 Dec 1;115(23):5371-81. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24628. Cancer. 2009. PMID: 19691089 Review.
-
Phase II clinical trials in oncology: strengths and limitations of two-stage designs.Cancer Invest. 2006 Jun-Jul;24(4):404-12. doi: 10.1080/07357900600705516. Cancer Invest. 2006. PMID: 16777694 Review.
Cited by
-
Innovative designs of point-of-care comparative effectiveness trials.Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Nov;45(Pt A):61-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.06.014. Epub 2015 Jun 19. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015. PMID: 26099528 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Model-Based Assessment of Alternative Study Designs in Pediatric Trials. Part II: Bayesian Approaches.CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2016 Aug;5(8):402-10. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12092. Epub 2016 Aug 17. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2016. PMID: 27530374 Free PMC article.
-
Bayesian Optimal Designs for Multi-Arm Multi-Stage Phase II Randomized Clinical Trials with Multiple Endpoints.Stat Biopharm Res. 2024;16(3):315-325. doi: 10.1080/19466315.2024.2344543. Epub 2024 May 17. Stat Biopharm Res. 2024. PMID: 39301054 Free PMC article.
-
An overview of the adaptive designs accelerating promising trials into treatments (ADAPT-IT) project.Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Oct;60(4):451-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.01.020. Epub 2012 Mar 15. Ann Emerg Med. 2012. PMID: 22424650 Free PMC article.
-
Uncontrolled pain: a call for better study design.Front Vet Sci. 2024 Feb 14;11:1328098. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1328098. eCollection 2024. Front Vet Sci. 2024. PMID: 38420206 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical