Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Feb;47(1):169-75.

Medical students' clinical skills do not match their teachers' expectations: survey at Zagreb University School of Medicine, Croatia

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Medical students' clinical skills do not match their teachers' expectations: survey at Zagreb University School of Medicine, Croatia

Mario Sicaja et al. Croat Med J. 2006 Feb.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate self-assessed level of clinical skills of graduating medical students at Zagreb University School of Medicine and compare them with clinical skill levels expected by their teachers and those defined by a criterion standard.

Method: The study included all medical students (n=252) graduating from the Zagreb University School of Medicine in the 2004-2005 academic year and faculty members (n=129) involved in teaching clinical skills. The participants completed anonymous questionnaire listing 99 clinical skills divided into nine groups. Students were asked to assess their clinical skills on a 0-5 scale, and faculty members were asked to assess the minimum necessary level of clinical skills expected from graduating medical students, using the same 0-5 scale. We compared the assessment scores of faculty members with students' self-assessment scores. Participants were grouped according to their descriptive characteristics for further comparison.

Results: The response rate was 91% for students and 70% for faculty members. Students' self-assessment scores in all nine groups of clinical skills ranged from 2.2-/+0.8 to 3.8-/+0.5 and were lower than those defined by the criterion standard (3.0-4.0) and those expected by teachers (from 3.1-/+1.0 to 4.4-/+0.5) (P<0.001 for all). Students who had additional clinical skills training had higher scores in all groups of skills, ranging from 2.6-/+0.9 to 4.0-/+0.5 (P<0.001 for all). Male students had higher scores than female students in emergency (P<0.001), neurology (P=0.017), ear, nose, and throat (P=0.002), urology (P=0.003), and surgery skills (P=0.002). Teachers' expectations did not vary according to their sex, academic position, or specialty.

Conclusion: Students' self-assessed level of clinical skills was lower than that expected by their teachers. Education during clinical rotations is not focused on acquiring clinical skills, and additional clinical skills' training has a positive influence on students' self-assessed level of clinical skills. There was no consensus among teachers on the required level of students' clinical skills.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Differences between teachers’ expectations and students’ self-assessment scores at the Zagreb School of Medicine. Grey bars – teachers’ expectations; open bars – students’ self-assessment scores. Clinical skills score is presented as mean of the group of skills with 95% confidence interval as error bars. BS – elementary skills, ER – emergency skills, NEU – neurology skills, ENT – ear, nose, and throat skills, CP – cardiopulmonal skills, GI – gastrointestinal skills, URO – urology skills, SURG – surgery skills, Gyn&Ob – gynecology and obstetrics skills. P<0.05 for all groups of clinical skills (independent samples t test).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. General Medical Council. Tomorrow's doctors. Recommendations on undergraduate medical education. London: General Medical Council; 1993.
    1. Board P, Mercer M. A survey of the basic practical skills of final-year medical students in one UK medical school. Med Teach. 1998;20:104–8.
    1. Sanson-Fisher RW, Rolfe IE, Jones P, Ringland C, Agrez M. Trialling a new way to learn clinical skills: systematic clinical appraisal and learning. Med Educ. 2002;36:1028–34. - PubMed
    1. Irby DM. Teaching and learning in ambulatory care settings: a thematic review of the literature. Acad Med. 1995;70:898–931. - PubMed
    1. Stillman PL, Regan MB, Swanson DB. A diagnostic fourth-year performance assessment. Arch Intern Med. 1987;147:1981–5. - PubMed

Publication types