Evaluation of sensitivity and inter- and intra-observer variability in the detection of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus with enhanced magnification endoscopy
- PMID: 16497625
- DOI: 10.1080/00365520510024016
Evaluation of sensitivity and inter- and intra-observer variability in the detection of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus with enhanced magnification endoscopy
Abstract
Objective: Magnification endoscopy with acetic acid or dye for diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus is presently undergoing clinical evaluation. Current studies report good accuracy in predicting specialized intestinal metaplasia. To date, however, there is no definitive information on the inter- and intra-observer variability of these methods applied to the diagnosis of normal and dysplastic Barrett's mucosa.
Material and methods: Sixty patients with endoscopically suspected Barrett's esophagus were investigated prospectively with the zoom endoscope after contrast enhancement of the mucosa with 1.5% acetic acid. Two hundred and twenty-three enlarged and histologically investigated areas of gastric, cardiac, normal and dysplastic Barrett's mucosa were photodocumented and in randomized sequence presented to 4 endoscopists in a blinded manner (2 with and 2 without experience of zoom endoscopy for evaluation). The reference for the first evaluation (A1) was standard endoscopic photographs of the respective, histologically confirmed mucosal entity. In a second evaluation (A2), the pictures were again interpreted by the same blinded investigators, but this time a modified pit-pattern classification as proposed by Sharma et al. was employed as the evaluation reference.
Results: The diagnostic sensitivity for specialized intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus calculated for the A1 evaluation ranged -- investigator dependently -- from 54.9% to 80.7% and for A2 from 42.2% to 81.5%. The inter- and intra-observer variability for the evaluation procedure A1 and A2 was high (all kappa values <0.4). In particular, the inexperienced investigators demonstrated high intra-observer variability and low sensitivity in comparison with the experienced investigators.
Conclusions: The diagnosis of Barrett's mucosa using enhanced magnification endoscopy after acetic acid instillation is associated with a high level of interobserver variability. One reason is a frequent mismatch between cardiac mucosa and non-dysplastic Barrett's mucosa.
Comment in
-
Magnification endoscopy with acetic acid in Barrett's esophagus.Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007 Apr;42(4):542. doi: 10.1080/00365520601101187. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007. PMID: 17454872 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Acetic acid-enhanced magnification endoscopy in the diagnosis of specialized intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia and early cancer in Barrett's oesophagus.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Mar 15;23(6):735-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02823.x. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006. PMID: 16556175
-
Inter- and intra-observer variability of magnification chromoendoscopy for detecting specialized intestinal metaplasia at the gastroesophageal junction.Endoscopy. 2004 Feb;36(2):160-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-814183. Endoscopy. 2004. PMID: 14765313
-
A randomized, prospective cross-over trial comparing methylene blue-directed biopsy and conventional random biopsy for detecting intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.Endoscopy. 2003 Dec;35(12):998-1003. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-44599. Endoscopy. 2003. PMID: 14648410 Clinical Trial.
-
Narrow band imaging for characterization of high grade dysplasia and specialized intestinal metaplasia in Barrett's esophagus: a meta-analysis.Endoscopy. 2010 May;42(5):351-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1243949. Epub 2010 Mar 3. Endoscopy. 2010. PMID: 20200809 Review.
-
Chromoendoscopy and magnification endoscopy for diagnosing esophageal cancer and dysplasia.Thorac Surg Clin. 2004 Feb;14(1):87-94. doi: 10.1016/S1547-4127(04)00042-8. Thorac Surg Clin. 2004. PMID: 15382312 Review.
Cited by
-
Endoscopic imaging in Barrett's esophagus: current practice and future applications.Ann Gastroenterol. 2012;25(2):89-95. Ann Gastroenterol. 2012. PMID: 24714225 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Endoscopic Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 11;60(7):1120. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071120. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024. PMID: 39064549 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Endoscopic evaluation and advanced imaging of Barrett's esophagus.Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2011 Jan;21(1):39-51. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2010.09.013. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2011. PMID: 21112496 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How Should We Report Endoscopic Results in Patient's with Barrett's Esophagus?Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Aug;63(8):2115-2121. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5067-7. Dig Dis Sci. 2018. PMID: 29675664 Review.
-
Acetic acid chromoendoscopy: Improving neoplasia detection in Barrett's esophagus.World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul 7;22(25):5753-60. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i25.5753. World J Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 27433088 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources