Best evidence topic report. Clean catch or bag specimen in UTI in non toilet trained children?

Affiliations

Review

Rachel Jenner et al. Emerg Med J. 2006 Mar.

. 2006 Mar;23(3):219-20.

doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.034314.

No abstract available

Similar articles

To clean or not to clean: effect on contamination rates in midstream urine collections in toilet-trained children.
Vaillancourt S, McGillivray D, Zhang X, Kramer MS. Vaillancourt S, et al. Pediatrics. 2007 Jun;119(6):e1288-93. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2392. Epub 2007 May 14. Pediatrics. 2007. PMID: 17502345 Clinical Trial.
A head-to-head comparison: "clean-void" bag versus catheter urinalysis in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in young children.
McGillivray D, Mok E, Mulrooney E, Kramer MS. McGillivray D, et al. J Pediatr. 2005 Oct;147(4):451-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.05.007. J Pediatr. 2005. PMID: 16227029
Obtaining urine for culture from non-potty-trained children.
Loane V. Loane V. Paediatr Nurs. 2005 Nov;17(9):39-42. doi: 10.7748/paed.17.9.39.s28. Paediatr Nurs. 2005. PMID: 16315817 Review.
The midstream muddle.
Bannatyne RM. Bannatyne RM. Saudi Med J. 2000 Mar;21(3):306. Saudi Med J. 2000. PMID: 11533807 No abstract available.
Urine-sampling methods for environmental chemicals in infants and young children.
Lee EJ, Arbuckle TE. Lee EJ, et al. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2009 Nov;19(7):625-33. doi: 10.1038/jes.2009.36. Epub 2009 Jun 24. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2009. PMID: 19550439 Review.

1. Hardy J D, Furnell P M, Brumfitt W. Comparison of sterile bag, clean catch and suprapubic aspiration in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in early childhood. Br J Urol 1976;48(4):279-83. - PubMed
1. Alam M T, Coulter J B, Pacheco J.et al. Comparison of urine contamination rates using three different methods of collection: clean-catch, cotton wool pad and urine bag. Annals of Tropical Paediatrics 2005 Mar;25(1):29-34. - PubMed