A comparison of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with cardiopulmonary bypass after prolonged cardiac arrest in dogs. Reperfusion pressures and neurologic recovery

Abstract

Resuscitability and outcome after prolonged cardiac arrest were compared in dogs with standard external cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) vs. closed-chest emergency cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was with no blood flow from VF 0 min to VF 10 min. Subsequent CPR basic life support (BLS) was from 10 min to VF 15 min. Then, group I (n = 13) received CPR advanced life support (ALS) from VF 15 min until restoration of spontaneous circulation to occur not later than VF 40 min. Group II (n = 14) received CPR-ALS from VF 15 min to VF 20 min without defibrillation, and then total CPB to defibrillation attempts started at VF 20 min, followed by assisted CPB to 2 h. Total ischemia time (no-flow time plus CPR time of MAP less than 50 mmHg) was unexpectedly shorter in group I (14.3 +/- 2.5 min) than in group II (18.6 +/- 2.3 min) (P less than 0.01). During CPR-BLS, coronary perfusion pressures were 25 +/- 9 mmHg in group I and 18 +/- 8 mmHg in group II (NS). Epinephrine during CPR-ALS, before countershock, raised coronary perfusion pressure to 40 +/- 10 mmHg in group I and 27 +/- 10 mmHg in group II (NS). In group II, coronary perfusion pressure increased during total CPB to 58 +/- 16 mmHg (P less than 0.01 vs. group I). Spontaneous normotension was restored in 11/13 dogs of group I and all 14 dogs of group II (NS). Ten dogs in each group followed protocol and survived to 96 h. Five of ten in group I and six of ten in group II were neurologically normal (NS). We conclude that: (1) Reperfusion with CPB yields higher coronary perfusion pressures than reperfusion with CPR-ALS; and (2) even after no blood flow for 10 min, optimized CPR can result in cardiovascular resuscitability and neurologic recovery, similar to those achieved by CPB.