Comparison of contrast-enhanced real-time live 3-dimensional dobutamine stress echocardiography with contrast 2-dimensional echocardiography for detecting stress-induced wall-motion abnormalities

Abstract

Background: Two-dimensional (2D) contrast-enhanced dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is used clinically to diagnose stress-induced wall-motion abnormality (WMA). We hypothesized that contrast-enhanced real-time 3-dimensional (3D) DSE could improve the detection rate of WMA, because from a single full-volume acquisition, multiple segments can be visualized.

Methods: We acquired both 2D and 3D DSE in 78 patients with known or suggested coronary artery disease (mean age: 65 years; 44 men). Dobutamine was infused using a standard protocol, and atropine added, if required. For 2D DSE, the intravenous contrast agent was injected at each stage and images displayed in a quadscreen format. For 3D DSE, contrast harmonic 3D data sets (full volumes) were acquired at baseline and peak stress. Using custom software, 3 short-axis views (from apex to base) were created, and wall motion scored using a wall-motion score index using a 16-segment model. A positive stress test was defined as new or worsened WMA or fixed abnormality during stress.

Results: Heart rate increased from 72 +/- 13 to 133 +/- 15/min (86 +/- 11% of age-predicted). A total of 1248 segments were analyzed at each stage for both modalities. A single segment at baseline and 5 segments at peak stress could not be assessed with contrast 2D DSE. In contrast, 88 segments at baseline and 39 segments at peak stress could not be assessed with contrast 3D DSE. With 3D DSE, the majority of uninterpretable segments were in the anterior and lateral walls. Significant correlations were noted between wall-motion score index by 2D and 3D DSE at baseline (r = 0.78) and peak stress (r = 0.83). The concordance rate (positive/negative findings) between modalities was 69% (54/78) on a patient basis and 88% (206/234) on a perfusion territory basis. When using 2D DSE results as the gold standard, sensitivity and specificity for detecting WMA by 3D DSE was 58% and 75%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity values were 67% and 94% for the right coronary artery, 53% and 81% for the left anterior descending coronary artery, and 88% and 100% for the left circumflex coronary artery territory, respectively.

Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced 3D DSE was feasible in the majority of patients. However, the moderate concordance between both modalities was a result of: (1) difficulties in visualizing the anterolateral segments because of the relatively large imprint of the transducer; and (2) lower frame rates with 3D DSE resulting in the erroneous diagnosis of dyssynchrony.