Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006;15(1):35-42.

How well do adolescents determine portion sizes of foods and beverages?

Affiliations

How well do adolescents determine portion sizes of foods and beverages?

Nelia P Steyn et al. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2006.

Abstract

In the present study, we examined how well adolescents (12-13 years) are able to select the correct dietary aid portion sizes after having been shown different food items. We also evaluated the effectiveness of two-dimensional life-size drawings and three-dimensional food models, used as dietary aids in this process. Fifty black children and 42 white children from Johannesburg participated in the study (N = 92). Trained interviewers individually tested each child following a prescribed sequence, throughout. Each participant was shown a plate of actual food of a pre-determined weight. The participant was required to select a two-dimensional drawing, and thereafter a three-dimensional food model, which most closely resembled the real food portion. In this manner, portion size estimation was evaluated with respect to 11 different food items. Correlations between nutrients calculated from actual weight of food portions and estimates ranged from 0.842 to 0.994 (P < 0.0001), indicating a significant positive linear association between the actual and estimated nutrients, using either of the dietary aids. However, findings also suggest that the drawings provided a better estimate of actual energy, fat and carbohydrates than did the food models (with respect to lying within the limits of agreement). On the other hand, the food models were more frequently selected correctly than the drawings. Hence, both methods had advantages and disadvantages. Overall, it was found that there were no gender differences (P < 0.05) when using either the models or drawings to estimate portion size, however, there were significant ethnic differences (P < 0.05). With two exceptions, black children selected the correct aids (drawings and models), more often compared with white children. It is recommended that in dietary interviews undertaken in black children in urban areas one could use either aid; while in white adolescents the use of the food models is recommended.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Examples of the 2-dimensional life-size drawings used in the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Examples of the 3-dimensional food models used in the study

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nelson M, Bingham S. Assessment of food consumption and nutrient intake. In: Margetts B, Nelson M, editors. Design Concepts in Nutritional Epidemiology. 2nd Ed. London: Oxford University Press; 1997.
    1. Livingstone MBE, Robson PJ. Measurement of dietary intake in children. Proc Nutr Soc. 2000;59:279–293. - PubMed
    1. Rutishauser IHE. Food models, photographs, or household measures? Proc Nutr Soc. 1982;7:144.
    1. Venter CS, MacIntyre UE, Vorster HH. The development and testing of a food portion photograph book for use in an African population. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2000;13:205–218. - PubMed
    1. Nelson M, Haraldsdottir J. Food photographs: practical guidelines I. Design and analysis of studies to validate portion size estimates. Public Health Nutr. 1998;1(4):219–230. - PubMed

Publication types