Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 May-Jun;13(3):277-88.
doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1957. Epub 2006 Feb 24.

Interface terminologies: facilitating direct entry of clinical data into electronic health record systems

Affiliations
Review

Interface terminologies: facilitating direct entry of clinical data into electronic health record systems

S Trent Rosenbloom et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 May-Jun.

Abstract

Previous investigators have defined clinical interface terminology as a systematic collection of health care-related phrases (terms) that supports clinicians' entry of patient-related information into computer programs, such as clinical "note capture" and decision support tools. Interface terminologies also can facilitate display of computer-stored patient information to clinician-users. Interface terminologies "interface" between clinicians' own unfettered, colloquial conceptualizations of patient descriptors and the more structured, coded internal data elements used by specific health care application programs. The intended uses of a terminology determine its conceptual underpinnings, structure, and content. As a result, the desiderata for interface terminologies differ from desiderata for health care-related terminologies used for storage (e.g., SNOMED-CT), information retrieval (e.g., MeSH), and classification (e.g., ICD9-CM). Necessary but not sufficient attributes for an interface terminology include adequate synonym coverage, presence of relevant assertional knowledge, and a balance between pre- and post-coordination. To place interface terminologies in context, this article reviews historical goals and challenges of clinical terminology development in general and then focuses on the unique features of interface terminologies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Two approaches to composing the concept “severe chest pain.” (Top) A user selects concepts and modifiers directly from a reference terminology permitting post-coordination, using description logic to combine unrelated atomic concepts sequentially, starting with “pain,” then adding the location modifier “chest” and the severity modifier “severe.” (Bottom) The user can combine the pre-coordinated concept “chest pain” in an interface terminology with the formally linked modifier “severe” from the list of chest pain modifiers. All concepts and modifiers in the interface terminology are mapped to formal representations in an external reference terminology. Both approaches allow the user to compose a meaningful concept having a formal representation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. The Leapfrog Group. Available from: http://www.leapfroggroup.org. Accessed 2/10/2005.
    1. Committee on Improving the Patient Record. The computer-based patient record: an essential technology for health care. , 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, 1991.
    1. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Using information technology. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, 2001.
    1. Bates DW, Boyle DL, Teich JM. Impact of computerized physician order entry on physician time. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:996. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bates DW, Evans RS, Murff H, Stetson PD, Pizziferri L, Hripcsak G. Detecting adverse events using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:115–28. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms