Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search
- PMID: 16502846
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03193557
Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search
Abstract
We investigated the role of spatial probabilities in target location during participants' performance of a visual search task. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that spatial probabilities could serve as a powerful attentional bias that produced faster detection of targets in high-probability locations than of those in low- or random-probability locations. The effect could not be explained by repetition priming alone. Moreover, responses to targets in low-probability locations were slowed only when a distractor was present in the high-probability location. In Experiments 3-5, we compared the effects of spatial probability with an explicit endogenous cue and a salient exogenous cue. Facilitation due to spatial probability was independent of any benefit afforded by the explicit endogenous cue but interacted with the salient exogenous cue, such that the exogenous cue validity effect was compressed for targets in the high-probability location. Together, these results suggest that the spatial probabilities governing target location constitute a potent bias of visual processing and, as such, can be considered an attentional cue that differs from both typical explicit endogenous and salient exogenous cues.
Similar articles
-
The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.Psychophysiology. 2016 May;53(5):650-62. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12615. Epub 2016 Feb 16. Psychophysiology. 2016. PMID: 26879628
-
Multiple attentional control settings at distinct locations without the confounding of repetition priming.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Oct;80(7):1718-1730. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1549-0. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018. PMID: 29959663
-
Asymmetries in the covert orienting of visual spatial attention to spatial and non-spatial cues in Alzheimer's disease.Brain. 1995 Dec;118 ( Pt 6):1421-35. doi: 10.1093/brain/118.6.1421. Brain. 1995. PMID: 8595474
-
Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering.Cortex. 2018 May;102:67-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.09.027. Epub 2017 Oct 9. Cortex. 2018. PMID: 29096874
-
Habitual versus goal-driven attention.Cortex. 2018 May;102:107-120. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Jul 4. Cortex. 2018. PMID: 28734549 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Using change detection to objectively evaluate whether novel over-the-counter drug labels can increase attention to critical health information among older adults.Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 May 26;6(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00307-z. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021. PMID: 34041617 Free PMC article.
-
Cognitive functions of the posterior parietal cortex: top-down and bottom-up attentional control.Front Integr Neurosci. 2012 Jul 4;6:38. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00038. eCollection 2012. Front Integr Neurosci. 2012. PMID: 22783174 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence for second-order singleton suppression based on probabilistic expectations.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Jan;45(1):125-138. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000594. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019. PMID: 30596437 Free PMC article.
-
Great Minds Think Alike? Spatial Search Processes Can Be More Idiosyncratic When Guided by More Accurate Information.Cogn Sci. 2022 Apr;46(4):e13132. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13132. Cogn Sci. 2022. PMID: 35411964 Free PMC article.
-
Independence of implicitly guided attention from goal-driven oculomotor control.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jul;84(5):1460-1476. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02491-6. Epub 2022 May 10. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022. PMID: 35538292 Free PMC article.