Satisfaction with planned place of birth among midwifery clients in British Columbia
- PMID: 16504905
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2005.10.012
Satisfaction with planned place of birth among midwifery clients in British Columbia
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare satisfaction with the birth experience among a population of women planning birth at home versus in hospital. In British Columbia, Canada, all midwives offer women meeting eligibility requirements for homebirth the choice to give birth in hospital or at home. Therefore, satisfaction can be attributed to planned place of birth, as the caregivers were the same in both settings. The mean overall score on the Labour Agentry Scale among women who had planned a homebirth (n = 550), 188.49 +/- 16.85, was significantly higher than those who planned birth in hospital (n = 108), 176.60 +/- 23.79; P < .001. Overall satisfaction with the birth experience was higher among women planning birth at home, 4.87 +/- 0.42 versus 4.80 +/- 0.49 on a scale of 1 to 5, although this difference was not statistically significant; P = .06. Among women whose actual place of birth was congruent with where they had planned, overall satisfaction was higher in the homebirth group, 4.95 +/- 0.20 versus 4.75 +/- 0.53; P < .001. Although satisfaction with the birth experience was high in both the home and hospital settings, women planning birth at home were somewhat more satisfied with their experience, particularly if they were able to complete the birth at home.
Similar articles
-
Place of birth and satisfaction with childbirth in Belgium and the Netherlands.Midwifery. 2009 Apr;25(2):e11-9. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2007.02.001. Epub 2007 May 18. Midwifery. 2009. PMID: 17512100
-
The experience of planned home birth: views of the first 500 women.Birth. 2009 Dec;36(4):297-304. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00357.x. Birth. 2009. PMID: 20002422
-
Midwifery care in rural and remote British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study of perinatal outcomes of rural parturient women with a midwife involved in their care, 2003 to 2008.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014 Jan-Feb;59(1):60-6. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12137. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014. PMID: 24588878
-
The dangers of planned hospital births.Midwifery Today Int Midwife. 2010 Summer;(94):30-2, 67-8. Midwifery Today Int Midwife. 2010. PMID: 20572620 Review.
-
Outcomes of planned home birth: an integrative review.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007 Jul-Aug;52(4):323-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2007.02.016. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007. PMID: 17603954 Review.
Cited by
-
Birth setting, transfer and maternal sense of control: results from the DELIVER study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jan 17;14:27. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-27. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014. PMID: 24438469 Free PMC article.
-
Satisfaction Level of New Mothers with Prenatal Care and the Healthcare Professionals Who Provide It.West Indian Med J. 2014 Dec;63(7):732-8. doi: 10.7727/wimj.2014.388. Epub 2015 Mar 20. West Indian Med J. 2014. PMID: 25867581 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring women's childbirth experiences: a systematic review for identification and analysis of validated instruments.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jun 29;17(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1356-y. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017. PMID: 28662645 Free PMC article.
-
Costs of Planned Home vs. Hospital Birth in British Columbia Attended by Registered Midwives and Physicians.PLoS One. 2015 Jul 17;10(7):e0133524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133524. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26186720 Free PMC article.
-
Global stakeholder perspectives of home birth: a systematic scoping review.Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 2;10(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01837-9. Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34727980 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical