Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Mar;40(3):268-71.
doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2005.022855.

Video analysis of falls experienced by paediatric iceskaters and roller/inline skaters

Affiliations

Video analysis of falls experienced by paediatric iceskaters and roller/inline skaters

C L Knox et al. Br J Sports Med. 2006 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate differences in the way iceskaters and roller/inline skaters fall.

Methods: Children's falls related to skating were videotaped and categorised based on type of skating activity, child's estimated age, direction of fall, whether the child attempted to break the fall, and whether the head struck the skating surface.

Results: In total, 216 iceskating and 201 roller/inline skating falls were captured on videotape. In both iceskating and roller/inline skating, the majority of falls were forward in direction. The skaters attempted to break the falls with their arms or hands in over 90% of falls in both iceskating (93.1%) and roller/inline skating (94.5%). A greater proportion of falls in iceskating resulted in the head striking the skating surface (13.0%) than did those in roller/inline skating (3.0%) (odds ratio = 4.8; 95% confidence interval 1.9 to 13.3; p<0.001).

Conclusions: This study found that paediatric iceskaters and roller/inline skaters fall similarly and that both types of skaters try to break their falls with their arms or hands; however, because iceskating takes place on a low friction surface, attempts to break falls with the arms or hands are often unsuccessful, leading to head and face injuries. The development of a new type of protective gear, a wrist guard with a non-slip palm, should stop iceskaters from striking the head, protect against upper extremity fractures, and unlike a bulky helmet, should not discourage children from skating.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: none

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Boyce S H, Quigley M A. Rollerblading injuries in children attending an accident & emergency department: Should the use of wrist splints be compulsory? Scot Med J 200146102–103. - PubMed
    1. de Nooijer J, de Wit M, Steenhuis I. Why young Dutch inline skaters do (not) use protection equipment. Eur J Public Health 200414178–181. - PubMed
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Injury and Poison Prevention and Committee on Sports Medicine and Fitness Inline skating injuries in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 1998101720–722. - PubMed
    1. McGrath D, Beattie T F. Rollerblading in children: the Edinburgh experience. Emerg Med J 199613354–355. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nguyen D, Letts M. Inline skating injuries in children: A 10‐year review. J Pediatr Orthop 200121613–618. - PubMed

Publication types