Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Mar;40(3):275-9.
doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2005.021931.

Aprotinin in the management of Achilles tendinopathy: a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Aprotinin in the management of Achilles tendinopathy: a randomised controlled trial

R Brown et al. Br J Sports Med. 2006 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Achilles tendinopathy is a common condition, which can become chronic and interfere with athletic performance. The proteinase inhibitor aprotinin (as injection) has been found to improve recovery in patellar tendinopathy (evidence level 1b) and Achilles tendinopathy. Internationally this therapy is being used based on this limited knowledge base.

Aim: To evaluate whether aprotinin injections decrease time to recovery in Achilles tendinopathy.

Method: A prospective, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial was performed comparing saline (0.9%) plus local anaesthetic injections and eccentric exercises with aprotinin (30,000 kIU) plus local anaesthetic injection and eccentric exercise. Three injections were given, each a week apart. In total, 26 patients, with 33 affected tendons, were enrolled for this study.

Results: At no follow up point (2, 4, 12, or 52 weeks) was there any statistically significant difference between the treatment group and placebo. This included VISA-A scores and secondary outcome measures. However, a trend for improvement over placebo was noted.

Conclusion: In this study on Achilles tendinopathy, aprotinin was not shown to offer any statistically significant benefit over placebo. Larger multicentre trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of aprotinin in Achilles tendinopathy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: none

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Capasso G, Testa V, Maffulli N.et al Aprotinin, corticosteroids and normosaline in the management of patellar tendinopathy in athletes: a prospective randomised study. Sports Exer Inj 19973111–115.
    1. Phillips B, Ball C, Sackett D.et alLevels of evidence. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Evidence‐based Medicine, 2001
    1. Capasso G, Maffulli N, Testa V.et al Preliminary results with peritendinous protease inhibitor injections in the management of Achilles tendinitis. J Sports Traumatol Rel Res 19931537–43.
    1. Robinson J, Cook J, Purdam C.et al The VISA‐A Questionnaire: A valid and reliable index to the clinical severity of Achilles tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med 200135335–341. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brunet M, Cook S, Brinker M.et al A survey of running injuries in1505 competitive and recreational runners. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 199030307–315. - PubMed

Publication types