Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Mar 1;24(7):1090-8.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.9208.

Advanced breast cancer patients' perceptions of decision making for palliative chemotherapy

Affiliations

Advanced breast cancer patients' perceptions of decision making for palliative chemotherapy

Elizabeth A Grunfeld et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: To examine advanced breast cancer patients' perceptions of the key decision-making consultation for palliative chemotherapy.

Patients and methods: One hundred two women with advanced breast cancer, who were offered palliative chemotherapy, participated in a study-specific semistructured interview examining perceptions of the information they had received and their involvement in the decision-making process. One hundred seventeen interviews included 70 in relation to first-line chemotherapy and 47 in relation to second-line chemotherapy (15 patients were interviewed in relation to both first- and second-line chemotherapy).

Results: Eighty-six percent of patient interviews (n = 101) reported patient satisfaction with the information they received, and 91% (n = 106) reported satisfaction with the decision-making process. Factors most influential in decisions to accept chemotherapy were the possibility of controlling the tumor (45%, n = 53 of patient interviews) and providing hope (33%, n = 28 of patient interviews; 19%, n = 13 being offered first-line chemotherapy v 43%, n = 20 being offered second-line chemotherapy; P = .006). Thirty-eight percent of patient interviews (n = 44) reported the patient as taking an active role in the decision-making process (33%, n = 23 at first-line chemotherapy v 43%, n = 20 at second-line chemotherapy; P = .06).

Conclusion: Women offered second-line chemotherapy were more likely to undergo chemotherapy because of the hope it offers and were more likely to take an active role in that decision compared with women who were offered first-line chemotherapy. Compassionate and honest communication about prognosis and likelihood of benefit from treatment may help to close the gap between hope and expectation and enable patients to make fully informed decisions about palliative chemotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Anticancer Treatment Goals and Prognostic Misperceptions among Advanced Cancer Outpatients.
    Paiva CE, Teixeira AC, Minto Lourenço B, Preto DD, Valentino TCO, Mingardi M, Paiva BSR. Paiva CE, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 21;19(10):6272. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106272. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35627808 Free PMC article.
  • Palliative care needs of cancer outpatients receiving chemotherapy: an audit of a clinical screening project.
    Morita T, Fujimoto K, Namba M, Sasaki N, Ito T, Yamada C, Ohba A, Hiroyoshi M, Niwa H, Yamada T, Noda T. Morita T, et al. Support Care Cancer. 2008 Jan;16(1):101-7. doi: 10.1007/s00520-007-0271-6. Epub 2007 Jul 5. Support Care Cancer. 2008. PMID: 17611783
  • The second patient? Family members of cancer patients and their role in end-of-life decision making.
    Laryionava K, Pfeil TA, Dietrich M, Reiter-Theil S, Hiddemann W, Winkler EC. Laryionava K, et al. BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Feb 17;17(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0288-2. BMC Palliat Care. 2018. PMID: 29454337 Free PMC article.
  • Dying From Cancer: Communication, Empathy, and the Clinical Imagination.
    Cripe LD, Frankel RM. Cripe LD, et al. J Patient Exp. 2017 Jun;4(2):69-73. doi: 10.1177/2374373517699443. Epub 2017 May 11. J Patient Exp. 2017. PMID: 28725864 Free PMC article.
  • Critical research gaps and translational priorities for the successful prevention and treatment of breast cancer.
    Eccles SA, Aboagye EO, Ali S, Anderson AS, Armes J, Berditchevski F, Blaydes JP, Brennan K, Brown NJ, Bryant HE, Bundred NJ, Burchell JM, Campbell AM, Carroll JS, Clarke RB, Coles CE, Cook GJ, Cox A, Curtin NJ, Dekker LV, Silva Idos S, Duffy SW, Easton DF, Eccles DM, Edwards DR, Edwards J, Evans D, Fenlon DF, Flanagan JM, Foster C, Gallagher WM, Garcia-Closas M, Gee JM, Gescher AJ, Goh V, Groves AM, Harvey AJ, Harvie M, Hennessy BT, Hiscox S, Holen I, Howell SJ, Howell A, Hubbard G, Hulbert-Williams N, Hunter MS, Jasani B, Jones LJ, Key TJ, Kirwan CC, Kong A, Kunkler IH, Langdon SP, Leach MO, Mann DJ, Marshall JF, Martin L, Martin SG, Macdougall JE, Miles DW, Miller WR, Morris JR, Moss SM, Mullan P, Natrajan R, O'Connor JP, O'Connor R, Palmieri C, Pharoah PD, Rakha EA, Reed E, Robinson SP, Sahai E, Saxton JM, Schmid P, Smalley MJ, Speirs V, Stein R, Stingl J, Streuli CH, Tutt AN, Velikova G, Walker RA, Watson CJ, Williams KJ, Young LS, Thompson AM. Eccles SA, et al. Breast Cancer Res. 2013 Oct 1;15(5):R92. doi: 10.1186/bcr3493. Breast Cancer Res. 2013. PMID: 24286369 Free PMC article. Review.

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources