Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Apr;96(4):670-6.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.061622. Epub 2006 Feb 28.

Retail tobacco outlet density and youth cigarette smoking: a propensity-modeling approach

Scott P Novak  1 , Sean F Reardon, Stephen W Raudenbush, Stephen L Buka
Affiliations

Retail tobacco outlet density and youth cigarette smoking: a propensity-modeling approach

Scott P Novak et al. Am J Public Health. 2006 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: We examined whether retail tobacco outlet density was related to youth cigarette smoking after control for a diverse range of neighborhood characteristics.

Methods: Data were gathered from 2116 respondents (aged 11 to 23 years) residing in 178 census tracts in Chicago, Ill. Propensity score stratification methods for continuous exposures were used to adjust for potentially confounding neighborhood characteristics, thus strengthening causal inferences.

Results: Retail tobacco outlets were disproportionately located in neighborhoods characterized by social and economic disadvantage. In a model that excluded neighborhood confounders, a marginally significant effect was found. Youths in areas at the highest 75th percentile in retail tobacco outlet density were 13% more likely (odds ratio [OR]=1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.99, 1.28) to have smoked in the past month compared with those living at the lowest 25th percentile. However, the relation became stronger and significant (OR=0.21; 95% CI=1.04, 1.41) after introduction of tract-level confounders and was statistically significant in the propensity score-adjusted model (OR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.001, 1.44). Results did not differ significantly between minors and those legally permitted to smoke.

Conclusions: Reductions in retail tobacco outlet density may reduce rates of youth smoking.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Secondary School Students. Bethesda, Md: National Institute on Druge Abuse; 2004. Monitoring the Future—National Survey Results on Drug Abuse 1975–2003; Vol 1. NIH Publication 04–5507.
    1. Results From the 2003 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings. Rockville, Md: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2004. Office of Applied Studies, NSDUH Series H-25, DHHS publication SMA 04–3964.
    1. Fichtenberg CM, Glantz SA. Youth access interventions do not affect youth smoking. Pediatrics. 2002; 109:1088–1092. - PubMed
    1. Levy DT, Chaloupka F, Gitchell J. The effects of tobacco control policies on smoking rates: a tobacco control scorecard. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2004; 10:338–353. - PubMed
    1. Rigotti NA. Youth access to tobacco. Nicotine Tob Res. 1999;1(suppl 2):S93–S97. - PubMed

Publication types