Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2006 Mar 4;332(7540):538-41.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7540.538.

Content of invitations for publicly funded screening mammography

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Content of invitations for publicly funded screening mammography

Karsten Juhl Jørgensen et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

The benefits and harms of screening for breast cancer are delicately balanced and women should decide for themselves, on an informed basis. Do the invitations give enough information to enable this?

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
How many women understand the full implications of screening? Credit: GARO/PHANIE/REX

Comment in

References

    1. Slaytor EK, Ward JE. How risks of breast cancer and benefits of screening are communicated to women: analysis of 58 pamphlets. BMJ 1998;317: 263-4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jørgensen KJ, Gøtzsche PC. Presentation on websites of possible benefits and harms from screening for breast cancer: cross sectional study. BMJ 2004;328: 148. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vainio H, Bianchini F. IARC handbooks of cancer prevention. Vol 7: breast cancer screening. Lyons: IARC Press, 2002.
    1. Domenighetti G, D'Avanzo B, Egger M, Berrino F, Perneger T, Mosconi P, et al. Women's perception of the benefits of mammography screening: population-based survey in four countries. Int J Epidemiol 2003;32: 816-21. - PubMed
    1. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Fowler FJ Jr, Welch HG. Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States. JAMA 2004;291: 71-8. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms