Predicting the performance of accommodating intraocular lenses using ray tracing
- PMID: 16516791
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.07.047
Predicting the performance of accommodating intraocular lenses using ray tracing
Abstract
Purpose: To predict and compare the amount of accommodation achievable by pseudophakic accommodating intraocular lenses (IOLs) using optical ray-tracing analysis.
Setting: Computational laboratory.
Methods: Two-element IOLs (2E-IOL, with mobile front or back optical elements) were compared with single-element IOLs (1E-IOL). Modeling using computer-assisted ray tracing of both IOL types assumed lens elements were equiconvex/equiconcave. The 4 possible combinations of configurations representing a wide range of varying positive and negative power (up to +40 diopters [D]) of front and back optical elements were evaluated.
Results: The 1E-IOLs offered limited amplitude of accommodation with axial shift (approximately 1.2 D/mm). For 2E-IOLs, configurations with high positive-power front elements returned the best amplitude of accommodation (up to approximately 3.0 D/mm when the front element power was +40 D).
Conclusions: Considering the maximum potential amounts of axial shifts available, 1E-IOLs were predicted to provide 1.0 D of accommodation or less and 2E-IOLs were predicted to provide up to 3.0 D to 4.0 D depending on design configuration and amount of axial shift achievable. Potential issues relating to accommodative aniseikonia and spherical aberration have been identified.
Comment in
-
Efficiency analysis of the dual-optics accommodating IOL.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Dec;32(12):1986. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.08.042. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006. PMID: 17137961 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Pilot study of new focus-shift accommodating intraocular lens.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 May;36(5):762-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.025. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010. PMID: 20457367 Clinical Trial.
-
Pseudophakic accommodation with translation lenses--dual optic vs mono optic.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004 Sep;24(5):450-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00222.x. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004. PMID: 15315660
-
Customized aspheric intraocular lenses calculated with real ray tracing.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Nov;35(11):1984-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.053. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009. PMID: 19878833
-
Accommodating intraocular lenses: a critical review of present and future concepts.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007 Apr;245(4):473-89. doi: 10.1007/s00417-006-0391-6. Epub 2006 Aug 30. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007. PMID: 16944188 Review.
-
Benefits and barriers of accommodating intraocular lenses.Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2017 Jan;28(1):3-8. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000323. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 27653608 Review.
Cited by
-
Functionalised polysiloxanes as injectable, in situ curable accommodating intraocular lenses.Biomaterials. 2010 Nov;31(32):8153-63. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.065. Epub 2010 Aug 7. Biomaterials. 2010. PMID: 20692702 Free PMC article.
-
Advances in lens implant technology.F1000 Med Rep. 2013;5:3. doi: 10.3410/M5-3. Epub 2013 Feb 1. F1000 Med Rep. 2013. PMID: 23413369 Free PMC article.
-
Paraxial analysis of the depth of field of a pseudophakic eye with accommodating intraocular lens.Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Jul;88(7):789-94. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318219c155. Optom Vis Sci. 2011. PMID: 21516047 Free PMC article.
-
Human eye ocular component analysis for refractive state and refractive surgery.Int J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul 18;10(7):1076-1080. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.07.09. eCollection 2017. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 28730109 Free PMC article.
-
Magnifications of single and dual element accommodative intraocular lenses: paraxial optics analysis.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011 Jan;31(1):7-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00795.x. Epub 2010 Nov 4. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011. PMID: 21054469 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources