The semantics of space: integrating linguistic typology and cognitive neuroscience
- PMID: 16516934
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.025
The semantics of space: integrating linguistic typology and cognitive neuroscience
Abstract
In the cognitive neuroscience literature on the distinction between categorical and coordinate spatial relations, it has often been observed that categorical spatial relations are referred to linguistically by words like English prepositions, many of which specify binary oppositions-e.g., above/below, left/right, on/off, in/out. However, the actual semantic content of English prepositions, and of comparable word classes in other languages, has not been carefully considered. This paper has three aims. The first and most important aim is to inform cognitive neuroscientists interested in spatial representation about relevant research on the kinds of categorical spatial relations that are encoded in the 6000+ languages of the world. Emphasis is placed on cross-linguistic similarities and differences involving deictic relations, topological relations, and projective relations, the last of which are organized around three distinct frames of reference--intrinsic, relative, and absolute. The second aim is to review what is currently known about the neuroanatomical correlates of linguistically encoded categorical spatial relations, with special focus on the left supramarginal and angular gyri, and to suggest ways in which cross-linguistic data can help guide future research in this area of inquiry. The third aim is to explore the interface between language and other mental systems, specifically by summarizing studies which suggest that although linguistic and perceptual/cognitive representations of space are at least partially distinct, language nevertheless has the power to bring about not only modifications of perceptual sensitivities but also adjustments of cognitive styles.
Similar articles
-
Spatial Frames of Reference in Traditional Negev Arabic: Language-to-Cognition Correlation.Cogn Process. 2015 Sep;16 Suppl 1:185-8. doi: 10.1007/s10339-015-0697-6. Cogn Process. 2015. PMID: 26302741
-
Neural correlates of locative prepositions.Neuropsychologia. 2008 Apr;46(5):1576-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.022. Epub 2008 Jan 5. Neuropsychologia. 2008. PMID: 18249423
-
The neural organization of spatial thought and language.Semin Speech Lang. 2008 Aug;29(3):226-38; quiz C6. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1082886. Semin Speech Lang. 2008. PMID: 18720319 Review.
-
Language within your reach: near-far perceptual space and spatial demonstratives.Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):889-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.010. Epub 2008 Aug 15. Cognition. 2008. PMID: 18706538
-
Bilingual and multilingual language processing.J Physiol Paris. 2006 Jun;99(4-6):355-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.016. Epub 2006 May 24. J Physiol Paris. 2006. PMID: 16723214 Review.
Cited by
-
This shoe, that tiger: Semantic properties reflecting manual affordances of the referent modulate demonstrative use.PLoS One. 2019 Jan 7;14(1):e0210333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210333. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30615694 Free PMC article.
-
Disembodying cognition.Lang Cogn. 2010 May;2(1):79-116. doi: 10.1515/LANGCOG.2010.004. Lang Cogn. 2010. PMID: 20802833 Free PMC article.
-
Action verbs and demonstrative pronouns affect volumetric affordance activation.Mem Cognit. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01783-0. Online ahead of print. Mem Cognit. 2025. PMID: 40897929
-
Carving the world for language: how neuroscientific research can enrich the study of first and second language learning.Dev Neuropsychol. 2014;39(4):262-84. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2014.906602. Dev Neuropsychol. 2014. PMID: 24854772 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The neural basis for spatial relations.J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Aug;22(8):1739-53. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21322. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010. PMID: 19642889 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources