Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Mar;44(3):720-4.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.3.720-724.2006.

Comparison between two amplification sets for molecular diagnosis of toxoplasmosis by real-time PCR

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison between two amplification sets for molecular diagnosis of toxoplasmosis by real-time PCR

S Cassaing et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Mar.

Erratum in

  • J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Nov;44(11):4295

Abstract

PCR is now commonly applied to the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. Although several methods are available, comparative studies are few, making it difficult to compare the performance of each technique. We compared the sensitivities of two real-time PCR assays through a prospective study on fetuses, neonates, and immunocompromised patients and on the ocular diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. The first system targeted the widely used B1 gene (GenBank accession number AF179871) while the second (RE) targeted a more recently described sequence repeated roughly 200 to 300 times (GenBank accession number AF146527). We demonstrated that molecular diagnosis requires the duplication of PCR assays, especially with the B1 system, as only one PCR was positive in 33.3% of cases. Our study showed that the RE target was more sensitive for all biological samples (amniotic fluid, placenta, aqueous humor, whole blood, and cerebrospinal and bronchoalveolar fluids) and significantly improved the performance of the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. Taking into consideration all clinical samples, the mean gain in the crossing point value was 4.2 +/- 1.7 cycles and was even more significant for amniotic fluid (5.8 +/- 1.7 cycles).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bastien, P. 2002. Molecular diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 96(Suppl. 1):S205-S215. - PubMed
    1. Bessières, M. H., S. Le Breton, and J. P. Séguéla. 1992. Analysis by immunoblotting of Toxoplasma gondii exo-antigens and comparison with somatic antigens. Parasitol. Res. 78:222-228. - PubMed
    1. Bessières, M. H., A. Berrebi, M. Rolland, M. C. Bloom, C. Roques, S. Cassaing, C. Courjault, and J. P. Séguéla. 2001. Neonatal screening for congenital toxoplasmosis in a cohort of 165 women infected during pregnancy and influence of in utero treatment on the results of neonatal tests. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 94:37-45. - PubMed
    1. Botterel, F., P. Ichai, C. Feray, P. Bouree, F. Saliba, R. Tur Raspa, D. Samuel, and S. Romand. 2002. Disseminated toxoplasmosis, resulting from infection of allograft, after orthotopic liver transplantation: usefulness of quantitative PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1648-1650. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buchbinder, S., R. Blatz, and A. C. Rodloff. 2003. Comparison of real time PCR detection methods for B1 and P30 genes of Toxoplasma gondii. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 45:269-271. - PubMed

MeSH terms