Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2006 Mar;44(3):729-37.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.3.729-737.2006.

Comparison of conventional PCR with real-time PCR and branched DNA-based assays for hepatitis C virus RNA quantification and clinical significance for genotypes 1 to 5

Christoph Sarrazin  1 , Barbara C Gärtner, Dorothea Sizmann, Rainer Babiel, Ulrike Mihm, Wolf Peter Hofmann, Michael von Wagner, Stefan Zeuzem
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Comparison of conventional PCR with real-time PCR and branched DNA-based assays for hepatitis C virus RNA quantification and clinical significance for genotypes 1 to 5

Christoph Sarrazin et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Mar.

Abstract

The key parameter for diagnosis and management of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is HCV RNA. Standardization of HCV RNA assays to IU is mainly based on genotype 1 panels. Little is known about the variability of commercially available HCV RNA assays for quantification of different genotypes. Two real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR assays (COBAS TaqMan HCV Test for use with the High-Pure System [HPS/CTM] and COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS TaqMan HCV Test [CAP/CTM]), one standard RT-PCR assay (COBAS Amplicor HCV Monitor 2.0 [CAM]), and one signal amplification assay (Versant Quantitative 3.0 [branched DNA [bDNA]]) were compared for quantification of genotypes 1 to 5 (n = 108). Using CAM as a reference assay for genotype 1-infected patients, the mean interassay differences compared with CAP/CTM, HPS/CTM, and bDNA were 0.16, -0.13, and -0.48 log(10) IU/ml HCV RNA, respectively. Comparison of CAM with CAP/CTM, HPS/CTM, and bDNA for the remaining genotypes showed the following results, respectively: 2a/c, -0.24, -0.78, and -0.49; 2b, -0.21, -0.18, and -0.64; 3a, 0.13, -1.04, and -0.55; 4, -0.52, -1.51, and -0.05; and 5, -0.28, -1.00, and -0.24 log IU/ml HCV RNA. A correct decision for treatment discontinuation in genotype 1 patients at week 12 was possible only when the same assay was used at baseline and week 12. Comparison of CAM with the CAP/CTM assay showed equal quantifications of genotype 1, 2, 3, and 5 samples, while genotype 4 samples were slightly underestimated. For the HPS/CTM assay, a significant underestimation of the HCV RNA concentrations of genotypes 2a/c, 3, 4, and 5 was observed. For the bDNA assay, a constant lower quantification of genotypes 1 to 3 was detected.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Correlation of HCV RNA concentrations of clinical samples between the CAM and the CAP/CTM assays. Results are shown separately for HCV genotype 1a/b, 2a/c, 2b, 3a, 4, and 5 samples. In addition to the single HCV RNA concentrations, the identity line and the regression line (boldface) are shown.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Correlation of HCV RNA concentrations of clinical samples between the CAM and the HPS/CTM assays. Results are shown separately for HCV genotype 1a/b, 2a/c, 2b, 3a, 4, and 5 samples. In addition to the single HCV RNA concentrations, the identity line and the regression line (boldface) are shown.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Correlation of HCV RNA concentrations of clinical samples between the CAM and the bDNA assays. Results are shown separately for HCV genotype 1a/b, 2a/c, 2b, 3a, 4, and 5 samples. In addition to the single HCV RNA concentrations, the identity line and the regression line (boldface) are shown.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Afdhal, N., E. Godofsky, J. Dienstag, V. Rustgi, L. Schick, D. McEniry, X. J. Zhou, G. Chao, C. Fang, B. Fielman, M. Myers, and N. Brown. 2004. Final phase I/II trial results for NM283, a new polymerase inhibitor for hepatitis C: antiviral efficacy and tolerance in patients with HCV-1 infection, including previous interferon failures. Hepatology 40(Suppl. 1):726A.
    1. Beld, M., R. Sentjens, S. Rebers, C. Weegink, J. Weel, C. Sol, and R. Boom. 2002. Performance of the new Bayer VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 assay for quantitation of hepatitis C virus RNA in plasma and serum: conversion to international units and comparison with the Roche COBAS Amplicor HCV Monitor, version 2.0, assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:788-793. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berg, T., C. Sarrazin, E. Herrmann, H. Hinrichsen, T. Gerlach, R. Zachoval, B. Wiedenmann, U. Hopf, and S. Zeuzem. 2003. Prediction of treatment outcome in patients with chronic hepatitis C: significance of baseline parameters and viral dynamics during therapy. Hepatology 37:600-609. - PubMed
    1. Dalgard, O., K. Bjoro, K. B. Hellum, B. Myrvang, S. Ritland, K. Skaug, N. Raknerud, and H. Bell. 2004. Treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavarin in HCV infection with genotype 2 or 3 for 14 weeks: a pilot study. Hepatology 40:1260-1265. - PubMed
    1. Davis, G. L., J. B. Wong, J. G. McHutchison, M. P. Manns, J. Harvey, and J. Albrecht. 2003. Early virologic response to treatment with peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 38:645-652. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources