Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Mar 7:7:22.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-22.

Knee movement patterns of injured and uninjured adolescent basketball players when landing from a jump: a case-control study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Knee movement patterns of injured and uninjured adolescent basketball players when landing from a jump: a case-control study

Quinette Louw et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: A common knee injury mechanism sustained during basketball is landing badly from a jump. Landing is a complex task and requires good coordination, dynamic muscle control and flexibility. For adolescents whose coordination and motor control has not fully matured, landing badly from a jump can present a significant risk for injury. There is currently limited biomechanical information regarding the lower limb kinetics of adolescents when jumping, specifically regarding jump kinematics comparing injured with uninjured adolescents. This study reports on an investigation of biomechanical differences in landing patterns of uninjured and injured adolescent basketball players.

Methods: A matched case-control study design was employed. Twenty-two basketball players aged 14-16 years participated in the study: eleven previously knee-injured and eleven uninjured players matched with cases for age, gender, weight, height and years of play, and playing for the same club. Six high-speed, three-dimensional Vicon 370 cameras (120 Hz), Vicon biomechanical software and SAS Version 8 software were employed to analyse landing patterns when subjects performed a "jump shot". Linear correlations determined functional relationships between the biomechanical performance of lower limb joints, and paired t-tests determined differences between the normalised peak biomechanical parameters.

Results: The average peak vertical ground reaction forces between the cases and controls were similar. The average peak ground reaction forces between the cases and controls were moderately correlated (r = -0.47). The control (uninjured) players had significantly greater hip and knee flexion angles and significantly greater eccentric activity on landing than the uninjured cases (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: The findings of the study indicate that players with a history of knee injuries had biomechanically compromised landing techniques when compared with uninjured players matched for gender, age and club. Descriptions (norms) of expected levels of knee control, proprioceptive acuity and eccentric strength relative to landing from a jump, at different ages and physical developmental stages, would assist clinicians and coaches to identify players with inappropriate knee performance comparable to their age or developmental stage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lees A. Methods of impact absorption when landing from a jump. English Medicine. 1981;10:207–211.
    1. Jones D, Louw Q, Grimmer K. Recreational and sporting injury to the adolescent knee and ankle: Prevalence and causes. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 2000;46:179–188. - PubMed
    1. Louw Q, Grimmer K, Vaughan Knee injury patterns among adolescent basketball players. South African Sports Medicine Journal. 2003;15:9–15.
    1. Arendt E, Dick R. Knee injury patterns among men and women collegiate basketball and soccer. NCAA data and review of the literature. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1995;23:694–701. - PubMed
    1. Gomez E, De Lee J, Farney W. Incidence of injury in Texas Girls' High school basketball. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1996;24:684–687. - PubMed

Publication types