Clinical decision making and views about psychiatric advance directives
- PMID: 16524992
- DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.57.3.350
Clinical decision making and views about psychiatric advance directives
Abstract
Objectives: Psychiatric advance directives allow competent persons to document advance instructions or designate a health care agent to communicate their preferences for future mental health treatment in the event of an incapacitating crisis. Although laws authorizing psychiatric advance directives have proliferated, little is known about clinicians' understanding and perceptions of these legal tools.
Methods: A total of 597 mental health professionals (psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers) completed a survey about their attitudes toward psychiatric advance directives and decision making about following such directives.
Results: Approximately half the sample (47 percent) agreed that advance instructions would be helpful to consumers with severe mental illnesses, and a majority (57 percent) endorsed health care agents as beneficial. Regardless of profession, clinicians had more positive attitudes about psychiatric advance directives when they correctly recognized that they were not required by state law to follow directives that note the patient' s refusal of appropriate medical treatment. In multivariate analyses, the decision to abide by a patient' s advance refusal of treatment in a hypothetical scenario was predicted by knowing the laws associated with these directives, valuing family opinions about treatment, and respecting patient autonomy.
Conclusions: Clinicians correctly apprised of the state law were more likely to endorse psychiatric advance directives. Thus clinicians may be more willing to use directives if they are educated about the legal parameters of their implementation. The clinicians' profession had only an indirect influence on whether clinicians would follow an advance instruction that noted the patient's refusal of appropriate treatment; rather, clinicians' values and legal knowledge had the greatest effect, highlighting the potentially complex ethical dilemmas faced by mental health professionals who encounter these directives.
Similar articles
-
Psychiatric wills of mental health professionals: a survey of opinions regarding advance directives in psychiatry.Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1999 Jan;34(1):30-4. doi: 10.1007/s001270050108. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1999. PMID: 10073118
-
Clinicians' attitudes regarding barriers to the implementation of psychiatric advance directives.Adm Policy Ment Health. 2006 Jul;33(4):449-60. doi: 10.1007/s10488-005-0017-z. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2006. PMID: 16237505
-
Effect of patients' reasons for refusing treatment on implementing psychiatric advance directives.Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Oct;58(10):1348-50. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.10.1348. Psychiatr Serv. 2007. PMID: 17914014
-
[Advanced directives in psychiatry: A review of the qualitative literature, a state-of-the-art and viewpoints].Encephale. 2013 Sep;39(4):244-51. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.10.012. Epub 2013 Mar 26. Encephale. 2013. PMID: 23537636 Review. French.
-
[Psychiatric advance directives--medical models into psychiatric medicine].Harefuah. 2014 Jan;153(1):39-42, 64. Harefuah. 2014. PMID: 24605406 Review. Hebrew.
Cited by
-
Australian Psychiatrists' Support for Psychiatric Advance Directives: Responses to a Hypothetical Vignette.Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2016 Jul 20;24(1):61-73. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2016.1198224. eCollection 2017. Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2016. PMID: 31983939 Free PMC article.
-
Advance directives in mental health care: evidence, challenges and promise.World Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;14(3):278-80. doi: 10.1002/wps.20268. World Psychiatry. 2015. PMID: 26407773 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
User-held personalised information for routine care of people with severe mental illness.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 5;2013(10):CD001711. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001711.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 24096715 Free PMC article.
-
Clinician knowledge and attitudes of mental health advance statements in Victoria, Australia.Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Oct;31(5):1164-1175. doi: 10.1111/inm.13022. Epub 2022 May 20. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2022. PMID: 35592928 Free PMC article.
-
[Use of joint crisis plans in psychiatric hospitals in Germany: results of a nationwide survey].Nervenarzt. 2012 May;83(5):638-43. doi: 10.1007/s00115-011-3311-x. Nervenarzt. 2012. PMID: 21633830 German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical