Influence of cavity dimension and restoration methods on the cusp deflection of premolars in composite restoration
- PMID: 16530819
- DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.025
Influence of cavity dimension and restoration methods on the cusp deflection of premolars in composite restoration
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to measure the cusp deflection by polymerization shrinkage during composite restoration for mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities in premolars, and to examine the influence of cavity dimension, C-factor and restoration method on the cusp deflection.
Methods: Thirty extracted maxillary premolars of similar size were prepared with four different sizes of MOD cavity, and divided into six groups. The width and depth of the pulpal wall of the cavity were as follows: group 1: 1.5x1 mm, group 2: 1.5x2 mm, group 3: 3x1 mm, and groups 4-6: 3x2 mm. Groups 1-4 were restored using a bulk filling with a composite. Group 5 was restored incrementally, and group 6 was restored with an indirect composite inlay. Cusp deflections were measured using LVDT transducers. The cusp deflections were compared between groups using ANOVA and Scheffe tests, and a correlation analysis was done.
Results: The cusp deflections of groups 1-4 were 12.1 (2.2), 17.2 (1.9), 16.2 (0.8) and 26.4 (4.2) microm, respectively. There was a strong positive correlation between the length cubed divided by the thickness cubed of the remaining cusp (L3/T3) and cusp deflection. The C-factor was related to the % flexure (100xcusp deflection/cavity width). The cusp deflections of groups 5 and 6 were 17.4 (2.0) and 17.9 (1.4) microm, respectively, which were much lower values than those of group 4.
Significance: The cusp deflection increased with increasing cavity dimension and C-factor. Use of an incremental filling technique or an indirect composite inlay restoration could reduce the cuspal strain.
Similar articles
-
Cuspal deflection, strain and microleakage of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with direct resin composites.J Dent. 2009 Sep;37(9):724-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.05.027. Epub 2009 Jun 6. J Dent. 2009. PMID: 19581032
-
How should composite be layered to reduce shrinkage stress: incremental or bulk filling?Dent Mater. 2008 Nov;24(11):1501-5. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.013. Epub 2008 Apr 22. Dent Mater. 2008. PMID: 18433857
-
Cuspal deflection of maxillary premolars restored with bonded amalgam.Oper Dent. 1999 Nov-Dec;24(6):337-43. Oper Dent. 1999. PMID: 10823082
-
A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006 Sep 1;7(4):79-88. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006. PMID: 16957794 Review.
-
[Minimal invasive treatment of cuspal fractures of premolars].Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2003 Jun;110(6):244-9. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2003. PMID: 12852061 Review. Dutch.
Cited by
-
Comparative Assessment of Cuspal Deflection in Premolars Restored with Bulk-Fill and Conventional Composite Resins.Front Dent. 2019 Nov-Dec;16(6):407-414. doi: 10.18502/fid.v16i6.3439. Epub 2019 Dec 20. Front Dent. 2019. PMID: 33089241 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth.Int J Biomater. 2022 Feb 11;2022:6643825. doi: 10.1155/2022/6643825. eCollection 2022. Int J Biomater. 2022. PMID: 35186088 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage stress and cuspal strain in natural and typodont teeth.Braz Oral Res. 2024 Aug 5;38:e061. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0061. eCollection 2024. Braz Oral Res. 2024. PMID: 39109762 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of the restorative technique on load-bearing capacity, cusp deflection, and stress distribution of endodontically-treated premolars with MOD restoration.Restor Dent Endod. 2019 Aug 7;44(3):e33. doi: 10.5395/rde.2019.44.e33. eCollection 2019 Aug. Restor Dent Endod. 2019. PMID: 31485429 Free PMC article.
-
Finite Element Analysis of Restored Principal Abutment in Free-End Saddle Partial Denture.Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2022 Jan 20;14:11-17. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S346286. eCollection 2022. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2022. PMID: 35082534 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources