Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience
- PMID: 16531155
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.011
Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience
Abstract
Background: Our study objective was to develop a technique for robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and to evaluate feasibility of the technology to address the technical limitations of conventional laparoscopy.
Methods: The study design was a case series analysis in a university hospital. Sixteen consecutive patients underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and were assessed for outcomes. Robot-assisted hysterectomy technique was refined and is described.
Results: There were no conversions to laparotomy. The mean uterine weight was 131.5 g (range 30 to 327 g). Median operating time was 242 minutes (range 170 to 432). Average estimated blood loss was 96 mL (range 50 to 300 mL). One patient experienced a delayed thermal bowel injury, 2 developed postoperative infections, and 1 developed a vaginal cuff hematoma that was managed expectantly. The median length of hospital stay was 1.5 days.
Conclusions: Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy is a feasible and promising new technique that may overcome surgical limitations seen with conventional laparoscopy.
Similar articles
-
Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 May;150(1):92-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.012. Epub 2010 Mar 5. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010. PMID: 20207063
-
Turkey's experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: a series of 25 consecutive cases.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010 Aug;282(2):163-71. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-1250-6. Epub 2009 Oct 17. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010. PMID: 19838722
-
A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):286-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Mar 6. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18439499
-
[Total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Operative technique, results and indications].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1995;24(8):802-10. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1995. PMID: 8636612 Review. French.
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: a review of recent comparative studies.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Aug;23(4):283-8. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328348a26e. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 21666467 Review.
Cited by
-
Early Experience of Robotic Hysterectomy for Treatment of Benign Uterine Disease.Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2016 Sep;38(9):450-455. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1592345. Epub 2016 Sep 19. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2016. PMID: 27643518 Free PMC article.
-
Early evaluation of a next-generation surgical system in robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A prospective clinical cohort study.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Sep;101(9):978-986. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14407. Epub 2022 Jul 21. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022. PMID: 35861102 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes between the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System and da Vinci® Xi in Robot-assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2025 May 22;14(2):132-136. doi: 10.4103/gmit.GMIT-D-24-00018. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2025. PMID: 40521581 Free PMC article.
-
Supracervical robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.JSLS. 2010 Oct-Dec;14(4):525-30. doi: 10.4293/108680810X12924466008006. JSLS. 2010. PMID: 21605516 Free PMC article.
-
Learning Curve Analysis of Different Stages of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:1827913. doi: 10.1155/2017/1827913. Epub 2017 Mar 8. Biomed Res Int. 2017. PMID: 28373977 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical