Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 May;35(5):282-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00256-005-0061-5. Epub 2006 Mar 14.

Reliability of the Crowe und Hartofilakidis classifications used in the assessment of the adult dysplastic hip

Affiliations

Reliability of the Crowe und Hartofilakidis classifications used in the assessment of the adult dysplastic hip

Ralf Decking et al. Skeletal Radiol. 2006 May.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of two commonly used radiographic classification systems in the evaluation of hip dysplasia in skeletally mature adults.

Design: Three observers with different levels of training independently classified 62 dysplastic hips on 51 standard anteriorposterior pelvis radiographs according to the criteria defined by Crowe and by Hartofilakidis. To assess intra-observer reliability, the same radiographs were reviewed 3 months later by the same observers.

Patients: At the time of the radiographic examination, the mean age of the 51 patients had been 54 years (range 18-82 years).

Results: A high correlation concerning the inter- and intra-observer reliability of both systems was demonstrated. Inter-observer reliability displayed a weighted kappa coefficient of 0.82 for the Crowe and 0.75 for the Hartofilakidis classification. Intra-observer reliability showed a kappa coefficient of 0.86 and 0.79, respectively.

Conclusions: Both classification systems can be recommended to compare collectives of adult patients with congenital dysplasia of the hip. However, for future clinical practice, it would be advisable to agree on one universally accepted system as a standard in the literature.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 May;82(4):508-11 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979 Jan;61(1):15-23 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Nov;78(11):1702-6 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988 Mar;70(2):182-6 - PubMed
    1. APMIS. 1989 Aug;97(8):689-98 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources