Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Feb;63(2):547-52.
doi: 10.1128/aem.63.2.547-552.1997.

Comparison of methods for isolation of mycobacteria from water

Comparison of methods for isolation of mycobacteria from water

M Neumann et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997 Feb.

Abstract

Twelve methods for the isolation of mycobacteria were compared by applying them in parallel to 26 samples of surface water and 109 samples of treated water. Each method was defined by a particular combination of decontamination method, growth medium, and incubation temperature. For the decontamination of surface water, we used cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) (30 min, 0.05%), as well as sample preincubation in tryptic soy broth (TSB) followed by decontamination with a cocktail of NaOH, cycloheximide, and malachite green. Treated water was decontaminated with 0.005 and 0.05% CPC (30 min). After enrichment by filtration, all samples were incubated on Lowenstein-Jensen medium (LJ), Ogawa egg yolk medium (OEY), and Ogawa whole-egg medium containing ofloxacin and ethambutol (OEOE) at temperatures of 30 and 37(deg)C. The efficacy of each method was determined by calculating the positivity rate, negativity rate, contamination rate, mean number of mycobacterial colonies grown, and mean number of different mycobacterial strains isolated. The last value was determined by subjecting the isolates to PCR restriction analysis and mycolic acid thin-layer chromatography. Statistical analysis demonstrated that both the TSB method and 0.05% CPC were appropriate for the decontamination of surface water. Decontamination with 0.005% CPC was best for treated water. The results for incubation on LJ were at least equal to those for incubation on OEY and always superior to the results with OEOE. At an incubation temperature of 30(deg)C, all methods achieved higher yields than at 37(deg)C.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. N Engl J Med. 1991 May 9;324(19):1332-8 - PubMed
    1. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1992 Jan;5(1):1-25 - PubMed
    1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Jul;54(7):1756-60 - PubMed
    1. Can J Microbiol. 1986 Jan;32(1):10-4 - PubMed
    1. Rev Infect Dis. 1987 Mar-Apr;9(2):275-94 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources