Formats for improving risk communication in medical tradeoff decisions
- PMID: 16537286
- DOI: 10.1080/10810730500526695
Formats for improving risk communication in medical tradeoff decisions
Abstract
To make treatment decisions, patients should consider not only a treatment option's potential consequences but also the probability of those consequences. Many laypeople, however, have difficulty using probability information. This Internet-based study (2,601 participants) examined a hypothetical medical tradeoff situation in which a treatment would decrease one risk but increase another. Accuracy was assessed in terms of the ability to determine correctly whether the treatment would increase or decrease the total risk. For these tradeoff problems, accuracy was greater when the following occurred: (1) the amount of cognitive effort required to evaluate the tradeoff was reduced; (2) probability information was presented as a graphical display rather than as text only; and (3) information was presented as percentages rather than as frequencies (n in 100). These findings provide suggestions of ways to present risk probabilities that may help patients understand their treatment options.
Similar articles
-
Probability information in risk communication: a review of the research literature.Risk Anal. 2009 Feb;29(2):267-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01137.x. Epub 2008 Nov 5. Risk Anal. 2009. PMID: 19000070 Review.
-
Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Dec;69(1-3):121-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.08.006. Epub 2007 Oct 1. Patient Educ Couns. 2007. PMID: 17905553
-
Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions.Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Dec;73(3):443-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.013. Epub 2008 Aug 21. Patient Educ Couns. 2008. PMID: 18722073
-
Aversion to side effects in preventive medical treatment decisions.Br J Health Psychol. 2007 Sep;12(Pt 3):383-401. doi: 10.1348/135910706X115209. Br J Health Psychol. 2007. PMID: 17640453
-
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003. PMID: 14698953 Review.
Cited by
-
Designing for patient decision-making: Design challenges generated by patients with atrial fibrillation during evaluation of a decision aid prototype.Front Digit Health. 2023 Jan 6;4:1086652. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.1086652. eCollection 2022. Front Digit Health. 2023. PMID: 36685619 Free PMC article.
-
Rethinking health numeracy: a multidisciplinary literature review.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):713-21. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2464. Epub 2007 Aug 21. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007. PMID: 17712082 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Do Preferred Risk Formats Lead to Better Understanding? A Multicenter Controlled Trial on Communicating Familial Breast Cancer Risks Using Different Risk Formats.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Feb 19;14:333-342. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S232941. eCollection 2020. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020. PMID: 32109999 Free PMC article.
-
Health vs. privacy? The risk-risk tradeoff in using COVID-19 contact-tracing apps.Technol Soc. 2021 Nov;67:101755. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101755. Epub 2021 Sep 21. Technol Soc. 2021. PMID: 34566204 Free PMC article.
-
How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making.Psychol Bull. 2009 Nov;135(6):943-73. doi: 10.1037/a0017327. Psychol Bull. 2009. PMID: 19883143 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources