Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Apr;60(4):285-9.
doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.015354.

Evaluating the effectiveness of public health interventions: the role and activities of the Cochrane Collaboration

Affiliations

Evaluating the effectiveness of public health interventions: the role and activities of the Cochrane Collaboration

Elizabeth Waters et al. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Apr.

Abstract

Public health decision makers, funders, practitioners, and the public are increasingly interested in the evidence that underpins public health decision making. Decisions in public health cover a vast range of activities. With the ever increasing global volume of primary research, knowledge and changes in thinking and approaches, quality systematic reviews of all the available research that is relevant to a particular practice or policy decision are an efficient way to synthesise and utilise research efforts. The Cochrane Collaboration includes an organised entity that aims to increase the quality and quantity of public health systematic reviews, through a range of activities. This paper aims to provide a glossary of the terms and activities related to public health and the Cochrane Collaboration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: none.

References

    1. Rychetnik L, Hawe P, Waters E.et al A glossary for evidence based public health. J Epidemiol Community Health 200458538–545. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Waters E, Doyle J, Jackson N. Evidence‐based public health: improving the relevance of Cochrane Collaboration systematic reviews to global public health priorities. J Public Health Med 200325263–266. - PubMed
    1. Jackson N, Waters E, Doyle J.et al Guidelines for systematic reviews in health promotion and public health. The fourth annual Campbell Collaboration colloquium, 18–20 Feb, Washington, DC 2004
    1. Howes F, Waters E, Doyle J.et al Evidence‐based public health: the importance of finding “difficult to locate” public health and health promotion intervention studies for systematic reviews. J Public Health Med 200426101–104. - PubMed
    1. Peersman G, Harden A, Oliver S.et alEffectiveness reviews in health promotion. London: Centre for the Evaluation of Health promotion and Social Interventions (EPI Centre), Social Science Research Unit, University of London Institute of Education, 1999

Publication types