Evaluating the effectiveness of public health interventions: the role and activities of the Cochrane Collaboration
- PMID: 16537343
- PMCID: PMC2566164
- DOI: 10.1136/jech.2003.015354
Evaluating the effectiveness of public health interventions: the role and activities of the Cochrane Collaboration
Abstract
Public health decision makers, funders, practitioners, and the public are increasingly interested in the evidence that underpins public health decision making. Decisions in public health cover a vast range of activities. With the ever increasing global volume of primary research, knowledge and changes in thinking and approaches, quality systematic reviews of all the available research that is relevant to a particular practice or policy decision are an efficient way to synthesise and utilise research efforts. The Cochrane Collaboration includes an organised entity that aims to increase the quality and quantity of public health systematic reviews, through a range of activities. This paper aims to provide a glossary of the terms and activities related to public health and the Cochrane Collaboration.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: none.
References
-
- Waters E, Doyle J, Jackson N. Evidence‐based public health: improving the relevance of Cochrane Collaboration systematic reviews to global public health priorities. J Public Health Med 200325263–266. - PubMed
-
- Jackson N, Waters E, Doyle J.et al Guidelines for systematic reviews in health promotion and public health. The fourth annual Campbell Collaboration colloquium, 18–20 Feb, Washington, DC 2004
-
- Peersman G, Harden A, Oliver S.et alEffectiveness reviews in health promotion. London: Centre for the Evaluation of Health promotion and Social Interventions (EPI Centre), Social Science Research Unit, University of London Institute of Education, 1999
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources