Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Mar 15:6:68.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-68.

Using consecutive Rapid Participatory Appraisal studies to assess, facilitate and evaluate health and social change in community settings

Affiliations

Using consecutive Rapid Participatory Appraisal studies to assess, facilitate and evaluate health and social change in community settings

Colin S Brown et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: To investigate how a relatively socio-economically deprived community's needs have changed over time, assess which recommendations from an earlier assessment were implemented and sustained, and consider whether serial Rapid Participatory Appraisal is an effective health research tool that can promote community development and has utility in assessing longitudinal change.

Methods: Rapid Participatory Appraisal involves communities in identifying and challenging their own health-related needs. Information on ten health and social aspects was collated from existing documentation, neighbourhood observations, and interviews with a range of residents and key informants, providing a composite picture of the community's structure, needs and services.

Results: The perceived needs after 10 years encompassed a wide construct of health, principally the living environment, housing, and lack of finance. Most identified upstream determinants of health rather than specific medical conditions as primary concerns. After the initial Rapid Participatory Appraisal many interviewees took the recommendations forward, working to promote a healthier environment and advocate for local resources. Interventions requiring support from outwith the community were largely not sustained.

Conclusion: Rapid Participatory Appraisal proved valuable in assessing long-term change. The community's continuing needs were identified, but they could not facilitate and sustain change without the strategic support of key regional and national agencies. Many repeatedly voiced concerns lay outwith local control: local needs assessment must be supported at higher levels to be effective.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Information pyramid for Rapid Participatory Appraisal. A ten-stage composite pyramid diagram detailing the community structure, physical and social environment, health profile, and local and national levels of service provision.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Murray SA, Tapson J, Turnbull L, McCallum J, Little A. Listening to local voices; adapting rapid appraisal to assess health and social needs in general practice. Brit Med J. 1994;308:698–700. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organisation . Guidelines for Rapid Appraisal to Assess Community Health Needs. Geneva: WHO; 1992.
    1. Ong BN, Humphris G, Annett H, Rifkin S. Rapid appraisal in an urban setting, an example from the developed world. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32:909–15. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90246-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murray SA, Graham LJ. Practice based health needs assessment: use of four methods in a small neighbourhood. Brit Med J. 1995;310:1443–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Acosta O, Toro PA. Let's ask the homeless people themselves: a needs assessment based on a probability sample of adults. Am J Community Psychol. 2000;28:343–66. doi: 10.1023/A:1005105421548. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources